首页> 外文期刊>Representation >TWENTY YEARS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTIONS IN HONG KONG: EXCLUSIVE CORPORATISM OR ALTERNATIVE DEMOCRATIC FORM?
【24h】

TWENTY YEARS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTIONS IN HONG KONG: EXCLUSIVE CORPORATISM OR ALTERNATIVE DEMOCRATIC FORM?

机译:香港进行功能选举的二十年:排他性的公司主义还是交替的民主形式?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scholars have long contemplated the possibility of using functional representation as an alternative form of democratic representation, instead of representation on a geographical basis. Since 1985, Hong Kong has had up to half of the legislature elected by functional constituencies (FCs) defined by professional occupations or economic sectors. This 20-year experience of FCs shows that it is difficult for functional representation to be compatible with modern democratic principles of equal voting rights, transparency and accountability. It has also adversely affected party development, led to legislative fragmentation and more particularistic bargaining in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong experience thus casts serious doubts on the feasibility of functional representation as an alternative democratic form of electoral representation.
机译:长期以来,学者一直在考虑使用功能性代表作为民主代表的替代形式的可能性,而不是基于地理的代表。自1985年以来,香港有多达一半的立法机构是由专业职业或经济部门定义的功能界别选举产生的。社区合作委员会的20年经验表明,职能代表很难与平等投票权,透明度和问责制的现代民主原则兼容。这也对政党的发展产生了不利影响,导致立法分散,在香港的谈判更加特殊。因此,香港的经验使人对功能代表制作为选举代表制的另一种民主形式的可行性产生严重怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号