首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries
【24h】

Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries

机译:检验环境库兹涅茨曲线假说:低,中下,中上和高收入国家的比较经验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The basic objective of this study is to empirically estimate the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis for four countries from low income, lower middle income, upper middle income and high income countries namely Tanzania, Guatemala, China and the USA, respectively. For the empirical investigation an econometric model consists of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions used a proxy for environmental degradation as a response variable, while, income, income square, energy consumption, urbanization growth rate, and trade openness are as regressors. Annual time series data covering the time period 1975-2014 are used for the empirical investigation. Results of Johansen co-integration test indicate that there exists one co-integrating relationship among the variables in the case of the USA and China, while in the case of Tanzania and Guatemala, there exist two co-integrating linkages. Similarly, the Pearson correlation result among the five variables shows that energy consumption has a significant positive relationship with trade openness and CO2 emissions in Tanzania, the USA, Guatemala and China, whereas, a significant negative relationship with economic growth in all these countries has been observed. The empirical results also reveal that in the case of Tanzania and China, trade openness has a significant positive relationship with environmental degradation, while in case of the USA and Guatemala, the correlation with urbanization growth rate is found significant with a negative sign. The ordinary least square result supports an EKC hypothesis for low and lower middle income countries. However, the study fails to find any support for the validity of an EKC hypothesis for upper middle income and high income countries during the period under the study. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的基本目标是从低收入国家,中低收入国家,中高收入国家和高收入国家(分别是坦桑尼亚,危地马拉,中国和美国)四个国家凭经验估算环境库兹涅茨曲线假设。在实证研究中,一个由二氧化碳(CO2)排放量构成的计量经济学模型用作环境变量的替代变量,而收入,收入平方,能源消耗,城市化增长率和贸易开放度则作为回归变量。涵盖1975-2014年时间段的年度时间序列数据用于实证研究。 Johansen协整检验的结果表明,在美国和中国的情况下,变量之间存在一种协整关系,而在坦桑尼亚和危地马拉的情况下,存在两个协整关系。同样,五个变量之间的皮尔森相关性结果表明,能源消耗与坦桑尼亚,美国,危地马拉和中国的贸易开放度和二氧化碳排放量呈显着正相关,而与所有这些国家的经济增长均呈显着负相关。观测到的。实证结果还表明,在坦桑尼亚和中国的情况下,贸易开放度与环境恶化具有显着的正相关关系,而在美国和危地马拉的情况下,与城市化增长率的相关性却具有显着的负相关关系。普通最小二乘结果支持低收入和中低收入国家的EKC假设。但是,在研究期间,该研究未能找到对中上等收入国家和高收入国家EKC假设有效性的任何支持。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号