首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Components sizing of photovoltaic stand-alone system based on loss of power supply probability
【24h】

Components sizing of photovoltaic stand-alone system based on loss of power supply probability

机译:基于供电概率损失的光伏独立系统组件尺寸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Stand-alone Photovoltaic System (SAPS) should be sized optimally since there no steady backup supply connected to it. An optimally sized SAPS should have a low overall cost without compromising the reliability of the system. This paper presents the review of the microgrid and the sizing of the SAPS. The review includes seven type of sizing methods for the microgrid. The sizing of the SAPS combines the Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) using the Iterative Method to determine the optimal size for the SAPS. The reliability of the SAPS is further improved using the Reliability Improvement Method (RIM). The location for the SAPS is at FKE Building, UTM, Johor. The results obtained using the RIM are compared with the results obtained from the LCC Method and the GCM. The GCM does not consider the overall cost of the SAPS throughout the lifetime of the system. The LCC Method consider the overall cost for the SAPS but the LPSP is fixed at 0.812%. While the proposed RIM improves the reliability of the SAPS up to 77.8% from 0.812% LPSP with only 4.9% cost increases.
机译:独立光伏系统(SAPS)的尺寸应达到最佳,因为没有稳定的备用电源与其相连。最佳大小的SAPS应该具有较低的总体成本,而不会损害系统的可靠性。本文介绍了微电网的概述和SAPS的大小。该审查包括针对微电网的七种上浆方法。 SAPS的大小使用迭代方法结合了电源概率损失(LPSP)和生命周期成本(LCC)来确定SAPS的最佳大小。使用可靠性改进方法(RIM)可以进一步提高SAPS的可靠性。 SAPS的位置位于柔佛州UTM的FKE大楼。将使用RIM获得的结果与通过LCC方法和GCM获得的结果进行比较。 GCM并未考虑系统整个生命周期内SAPS的总体成本。 LCC方法考虑了SAPS的总成本,但LPSP固定为0.812%。提议的RIM将SAPS的可靠性从0.812%的LPSP提高到77.8%,而成本却仅增加4.9%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号