首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Comparison of sectoral low-carbon transition pathways in China under the nationally determined contribution and 2 °C targets
【24h】

Comparison of sectoral low-carbon transition pathways in China under the nationally determined contribution and 2 °C targets

机译:国家确定贡献和2°C目标部门低碳转型途径的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

National climate targets must be decomposed into key areas to guide mitigation actions. This paper presents a comparative study of China's low-carbon transition pathways at the sectoral level under the nationally determined contribution (NDC) and 2 degrees C targets, using the energy system model and detailed sectoral information. The results show that each sector plays different roles in terms of emission trends, mitigation potentials, technology roadmaps, investment requirements, and mitigation costs. The power sector is expected to contribute around 50% of the total mitigation. The industry sector has better cost-effective performance, with high mitigation potential and low investment requirement. By contrast, the transport and power sectors account for around 90% of total investment demand. The building and transport sectors have substantial mitigation opportunities that can be realized through technologies with negative mitigation costs. Conversely, the industry sector faces challenges in promoting carbon capture and storage, which has the highest mitigation cost. Compared with the sectoral transition pathways under the NDC target, the 2 degrees C scenario requires a rapid nearterm decarbonization of the power sector and additional emission reductions in end-use sectors. This decarbonization is possible through comprehensive deployment of advanced low-carbon technologies as well as measures that increase investments in low-carbon infrastructure and decrease investments in fossil fuel-based technologies in the power and transport sectors. Therefore, it is important to thoroughly understand the sectoral transition pathways under different climate targets in order to coordinate inter-sectoral actions and resources in a cost-effective manner.
机译:国家气候目标必须分解成关键领域,以指导缓解行动。本文介绍了中国在国家确定的贡献(NDC)和2℃靶标的部门水平下的低碳过渡途径的比较研究,使用能源系统模型和详细的部门信息。结果表明,每个部门在排放趋势,减缓潜力,技术路线图,投资要求和缓解成本方面发挥着不同的作用。预计电力部门将占总缓解的50%左右。该行业具有更高的经济高效性能,具有较高的缓解潜力和低投资要求。相比之下,运输和电力部门占总投资需求的90%。建筑物和运输部门具有实质性缓解机会,可以通过具有负面缓解成本的技术实现。相反,行业部门面临促进碳捕捞量和储存的挑战,这具有最高的缓解成本。与NDC目标下的部门转换途径相比,2摄氏度方案需要快速接近电力界面的近碳化,以及最终使用扇区的额外排放减少。通过全面部署先进的低碳技术以及提高低碳基础设施投资的措施,可释放这种脱碳,并减少电力运输部门的化石燃料技术投资。因此,重要的是要在不同的气候目标下彻底了解部门过渡途径,以便以成本效益的方式协调部门间行动和资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号