首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Solar irradiance time series derived from high-quality measurements, satellite-based models, and reanalyses at a near-equatorial site in Brazil
【24h】

Solar irradiance time series derived from high-quality measurements, satellite-based models, and reanalyses at a near-equatorial site in Brazil

机译:太阳辐射时间序列来自高质量的测量结果,基于卫星的模型,并在巴西的近赤道地点进行了重新分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study analyzes five years of 1-min solar global horizontal irradiance (GHI) and direct normal irradiance (DNI) observations obtained at Petrolina (northeast Brazil). Quality-assured hourly and daily averages are obtained after applying filters and methodologies based on a Baseline Solar Radiation Network (BSRN) quality-control procedure. To calculate correct hourly averages, a minimum fraction of 20% of valid GHI or DNI minutely data is needed, as well as at least 60% of valid days to calculate correct daily-mean monthly values. An asymmetric diurnal pattern is found in GHI and DNI during all months, attributed to consistently higher cloudiness in the morning. The quality-assured hourly and monthly-mean GHI and DNI time series are compared to estimates from 11 solar databases regularly used in solar resource assessment studies: CAMS, CERES, ERA5, INPE, MERRA-2, Meteonorm, NASA-POWER, NSRDB, SARAH, SWERA-BR, and SWERA-US. For hourly GHI values, a range of RMS differences is found between the best (CAMS, 17.3%) and the worst (MERRA-2, 38.9%) results. The latter database is also affected by a larger bias (18.7%) than CAMS (4%). Larger RMS differences are found with hourly DNI, in a range extending from 37% (CAMS) to 63.4% (ERA5). Biases are all above 12%, except for CERES (-1%). For long-term mean-monthly GHI results, low biases of less than 1% are obtained with CAMS, CERES and NASA-POWER, whereas MERRA-2 overestimates (13%). Larger biases are found for mean-monthly DNI, spanning between CAMS (3%) and Meteonorm (-18.4%). Overall, CAMS appears the most consistent solar database for long-term irradiance time series at Petrolina. The significant differences found here between modeled databases are larger than expected, and underline the importance of regional validation studies like this one to decrease the incidence of uncertainties in solar resource assessments on the design and performance of solar energy projects.
机译:这项研究分析了在Petrolina(巴西东北部)获得的5年的1分钟太阳全局水平辐照度(GHI)和直接正常辐照度(DNI)观测值。在应用基于基线太阳辐射网络(BSRN)质量控制程序的过滤器和方法后,可以获得质量保证的小时和每日平均值。要计算正确的每小时平均值,需要至少20%的有效GHI或DNI分钟数据,以及至少60%的有效天数来计算正确的日均月度值。在所有月份的GHI和DNI中均发现了不对称的昼夜模式,这归因于早晨持续阴云密布。将质量有保证的每小时和每月平均GHI和DNI时间序列与经常用于太阳能资源评估研究的11个太阳能数据库的估计值进行比较:CAMS,CERES,ERA5,INPE,MERRA-2,Meteonorm,NASA-POWER,NSRDB, SARAH,SWERA-BR和SWERA-US。对于每小时的GHI值,在最佳结果(CAMS,17.3%)和最差结果(MERRA-2,38.9%)之间发现了一系列RMS差异。后者的数据库也受到比CAMS(4%)更大的偏差(18.7%)的影响。每小时DNI发现较大的RMS差异,范围从37%(CAMS)到63.4%(ERA5)。除CERES(-1%)外,所有偏差均高于12%。对于长期平均每月GHI结果,使用CAMS,CERES和NASA-POWER可获得低于1%的低偏差,而MERRA-2高估了(13%)。发现平均每月DNI的偏差较大,介于CAMS(3%)和Meteonorm(-18.4%)之间。总体而言,CAMS在Petrolina上是长期辐照时间序列最一致的太阳能数据库。此处在建模数据库之间发现的显着差异超出了预期,并强调了像这样的区域验证研究的重要性,这对于减少太阳能资源评估对太阳能项目的设计和性能的不确定性的发生具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号