首页> 外文期刊>Renewable energy >Renewable electricity support system: Design of a variable premium system based on the Spanish experience
【24h】

Renewable electricity support system: Design of a variable premium system based on the Spanish experience

机译:可再生电力支持系统:根据西班牙经验设计可变保费系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The most widespread support system for renewable-energy-sourced electricity (RES-E) is the feed-in tariff (FIT). FITs can be divided into fixed-FIT and premium systems. The latter type may also include a cap and floor option, turning it into a variable premium system. The cap value (upper limit) aims to avoid windfall profits for the RES-E investor if the electricity price rises quickly, while the floor value (lower limit) ensures minimum revenue, reducing the risk caused by low electricity prices. This paper examines the performance of the variable premium system as established in Spain (hourly-based) and investigates the possibility of alternative novel designs. For this purpose, an analysis was undertaken of the cap & floor system established in Spain based on real market data over a three year period and its performance compared to the fixed premium system (no cap & floor limitations) and two novel cap & floor designs (monthly- and yearly-based). Two other novel alternatives were also considered: daily- and weekly-based. It is shown that the hourly-based cap & floor system did not result in a reduction of the overall RES-E revenue compared to the fixed premium system over the three year period, though revenue was more evenly distributed from year-to-year. The paper concludes that variable premium systems should be based on monthly or yearly cap & floor mechanism as opposed to an hourly one.
机译:可再生能源电力的最广泛支持系统(RES-E)是上网电价(FIT)。 FIT可以分为固定FIT和高级系统。后者可能还包括上限和下限选项,将其转变为可变溢价系统。上限(上限)旨在避免RES-E投资者在电价快速上涨时获得暴利,而底值(下限)则确保收益最小,从而降低了电价低廉带来的风险。本文研究了西班牙建立的可变溢价系统的性能(基于小时),并研究了替代新颖设计的可能性。为此,根据三年内的实际市场数据对西班牙建立的上限和下限系统进行了分析,并将其与固定溢价系统(无上限和下限)和两种新颖的上限和下限设计相比的性能进行了分析。 (基于每月和每年)。还考虑了其​​他两种新颖的替代方法:每天和每周一次。结果表明,在三年期间,基于小时的上限和下限系统与固定溢价系统相比并没有导致RES-E整体收入的减少,尽管每年的收入分配更为平均。本文的结论是,可变保费制度应基于每月或每年的上限和下限机制,而不是每小时的上限和下限机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号