...
首页> 外文期刊>Renewable energy >Environmental assessment of crop residue processing methods in rural areas of Northeast China
【24h】

Environmental assessment of crop residue processing methods in rural areas of Northeast China

机译:东北农村地区农作物残渣加工方式的环境评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The two main processing methods for crop residue in Northeast China are stove burning for house heating and open burning as a waste product. Neither method is appropriate, as large amounts of pollutants released. This paper, therefore, proposes biomass boilers as a source for rural district heating. In a rural area in Northeast China, the PM2.5 dispersions by the aforementioned three methods were simulated using the AERMOD model and the environmental impacts were assessed. The results show that the maximum peak concentration (MPC) is 1248 mu g/m(3) for stove burning and 90,602 mu g/m(3) for open burning; the general average concentration (GAC) is 345 mu g/m(3) for stove burning and 1897 mu g/m(3) for open burning. These concentration levels greatly exceed the thresholds established by China, the USA, and the WHO. However, the MPC for biomass boilers is only 2.76 mu g/m(3), a 99.78% and 99.99% decrease from the stove burning and open burning methods, respectively. The GAC for biomass boilers is 13 mu g/m(3), a decrease of 99.62% and 99.93%, respectively. Meteorological characteristics greatly influence the dispersion patterns of pollutants. In summary, replacing household heating stoves with biomass boilers is a bio-energy utilization method worth implementing widely to substantially improve the local atmospheric environment. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:东北地区两种主要的农作物残渣处理方法是用火炉燃烧作为房屋取暖和露天燃烧作为废物。这两种方法都不适合,因为会释放大量污染物。因此,本文提出了将生物质锅炉作为农村集中供热的来源。在中国东北的农村地区,使用AERMOD模型模拟了上述三种方法的PM2.5分散体,并评估了其环境影响。结果表明,炉灶燃烧的最大峰值浓度(MPC)为1248μg / m(3),露天燃烧的最大峰值浓度为90,602 mu g / m(3);炉灶燃烧的一般平均浓度(GAC)为345μg / m(3),露天燃烧的一般平均浓度为1897 mu g / m(3)。这些浓度水平大大超过了中国,美国和世界卫生组织设定的阈值。但是,用于生物质锅炉的MPC仅为2.76μg / m(3),与火炉燃烧法和露天燃烧法相比分别降低了99.78%和99.99%。生物质锅炉的GAC为13μg / m(3),分别降低了99.62%和99.93%。气象特征极大地影响了污染物的扩散方式。综上所述,用生物质锅炉代替家用取暖炉是一种生物能源利用方法,值得广泛实施以实质性改善当地的大气环境。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Renewable energy》 |2015年第12期|22-29|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Municipal & Environm Engn, Harbin 150006, Peoples R China.;

    Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Municipal & Environm Engn, Harbin 150006, Peoples R China.;

    Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Municipal & Environm Engn, Harbin 150006, Peoples R China.;

    Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Energy Technol, Aalto, Finland.;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Crop residue; Biomass boiler; Rural area; PM2.5;

    机译:作物残渣;生物质锅炉;农村;PM2.5;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号