首页> 外文期刊>Renewable energy >Co-firing: An exergoenvironmental analysis applied to power plants modified for burning coal and rice straw
【24h】

Co-firing: An exergoenvironmental analysis applied to power plants modified for burning coal and rice straw

机译:共烧:应用于燃煤和稻草秸秆改造的发电厂的外部环境分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An exergy approach to environmental impacts is proposed as an exergoenvironmental analysis methodology to be applied in a power plants modified for burning in a co-firing process, including external impacts originated from the routes of the coal and the biomass. A new Global Greenhouse Gases (i(GHG)(Global)) index is also presented in order to compare different co-firing scenarios. The methodology took into account the global warming impact category using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) index. The operating details were obtained from an existing 50 MWe PC power plant. Two scenarios were analyzed: (A) burning only pulverized coal; and (B) burning pulverized coal and rice straw in a co-firing process. The results showed a total of exergoenvironmental impact of 16.43 kg CO2-eq/s for scenario A and 12.3 kg CO2-eq/s for scenario B, that is, around 25.13% lower. In relation with the exergoenvironmental performance variables, the steam generator showed the highest environmental impact associated with the exergy destruction ((B) over dot(D,k)). Also, when scenario B was considered, the relative difference of specific environmental impact (r(b,k)) shows an important reduction around 30% lower in the steam generator. The (i(GHG)(Global)) index indicated values of 0.5 to scenario A and 0.564 to the scenario B. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:提出了一种对环境影响的火用方法,作为一种能环境环境分析方法,该方法将应用于在共烧过程中进行燃烧改造的发电厂,包括源自煤炭和生物质路线的外部影响。还提出了新的全球温室气体(i(GHG)(全球))指数,以比较不同的共燃情景。该方法使用全球变暖潜势(GWP)指数考虑了全球变暖影响类别。操作细节是从现有的50 MWe PC电厂获得的。分析了两种情况:(A)仅燃烧粉煤; (B)在共烧过程中燃烧煤粉和稻草。结果表明,情景A的总体环境环境影响为16.43 kg CO2-eq / s,情景B的总体环境影响为12.3 kg CO2-eq / s,即降低了约25.13%。与exergo-environmental性能变量有关,蒸汽发生器显示出与火用破坏相关的最大环境影响((B)超过dot(D,k))。同样,当考虑方案B时,特定环境影响的相对差异(r(b,k))显示出蒸汽发生器的重要降低量降低了约30%。 (i(GHG)(Global))索引指示方案A的值为0.5,方案B的值为0.564。(C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号