首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >The nuclear industry's transition to risk-informed regulation and operation in the United States
【24h】

The nuclear industry's transition to risk-informed regulation and operation in the United States

机译:美国核工业向风险告知型监管和运营的过渡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper summarizes a study of the transition of the United States nuclear industry from a prescriptive regulatory structure to a more risk informed approach to operations and regulations. The transition occurred over a 20 yr period in which gradual changes were made in the fundamental regulations and to the approach to nuclear safety and operations. While the number of actual regulatory changes were few, they are continuing. The utilities that embraced risk informed operations made dramatic changes in the way they approached operations and outage management. Those utilities that used risk in operations showed dramatic improvement in safety based on Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) performance indicators. It was also shown that the use of risk did not negatively affect safety performance of the plants compared to standard prescriptive approaches. This was despite having greater flexibility in compliance to regulatory standards and the use of the newly instituted risk-informed reactor oversight process. Key factors affecting the successful transition to a more risk-informed approach to regulations and operations are: strong top management support and leadership both at the regulator and the utility; education and training in risk principles and probabilistic risk Assessment tools for engineers, operators and maintenance staff; a slow and steady introduction of risk initiatives in areas that can show value to both the regulator and the industry; a transparent regulatory foundation built around a safety goal policy and the development of a strong safety culture at the utility to allow for more independence in safety compliance and risk management. The experience of the United States shows positive results in both safety and economics. The INPO and NRC metrics presented show that the use of risk information in operations and regulation is marginally better with no degradation in safety when plants that have embraced risk-informed approaches are compared to those that have not. The use of risk-informed approaches allows both the regulator and the industry to focus on important safety issues. The transition to risk-informed regulation also required a "culture change" by both the regulators and the utilities. Caution should be taken, however, since the basis of the US transition to risk-informed regulation is founded on a long history of a regulatory structure and practices that have matured the industry to a point where the next step could be taken.
机译:本文总结了对美国核工业从规范性监管结构向更具风险意识的运营和监管方法转变的研究。过渡发生在20年期间,在此期间,基本法规以及核安全和运行方法都发生了逐步变化。尽管实际的法规变更数量很少,但仍在继续。接受风险告知操作的公用事业公司在进行操作和中断管理方面的方式发生了巨大变化。根据核电运营研究所(INPO)的绩效指标,那些在运营中使用风险的公用事业公司在安全性方面取得了显着改善。还表明,与标准的规定方法相比,使用风险不会对植物的安全性能产生负面影响。尽管在遵守法规标准和使用新近建立的有风险依据的反应堆监督程序方面有更大的灵活性。影响成功过渡到更具风险意识的法规和运营方法的关键因素包括:在监管机构和公用事业部门的强大高层管理支持和领导;针对工程师,操作员和维护人员的风险原则和概率风险评估工具的教育和培训;在对监管机构和整个行业都有价值的领域中缓慢而稳定地引入风险计划;建立在安全目标政策周围的透明监管基础,并在公用事业公司建立牢固的安全文化,以使安全合规性和风险管理更加独立。美国的经验在安全性和经济性两方面均显示出积极的成果。提出的INPO和NRC指标表明,将采用风险知情方法的工厂与未采用风险知情方法的工厂进行比较时,在运营和监管中使用风险信息略有改善,并且不会降低安全性。风险告知方法的使用使监管机构和整个行业都可以专注于重要的安全问题。向风险告知型监管的过渡还要求监管机构和公用事业部门都进行“文化变革”。但是,应谨慎行事,因为美国向风险告知型监管过渡的基础是建立在监管结构和实践的悠久历史上,而监管结构和实践已使该行业成熟到可以采取下一步措施的地步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号