首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >Expert judgement combination using moment methods
【24h】

Expert judgement combination using moment methods

机译:使用矩量法的专家判断组合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Moment methods have been employed in decision analysis, partly to avoid the computational burden that decision models involving continuous probability distributions can suffer from. In the Bayes linear (BL) methodology prior judgements about uncertain quantities are specified using expectation (rather than probability) as the fundamental notion. BL provides a strong foundation for moment methods, rooted in work of De Finetti and Goldstein. The main objective of this paper is to discuss in what way expert assessments of moments can be combined, in a non-Bayesian way, to construct a prior assessment. We show that the linear pool can be justified in an analogous but technically different way to linear pools for probability assessments, and that this linear pool has a very convenient property: a linear pool of experts' assessments of moments is coherent if each of the experts has given coherent assessments. To determine the weights of the linear pool we give a method of performance based weighting analogous to Cooke's classical model and explore its properties. Finally, we compare its performance with the classical model on data gathered in applications of the classical model.
机译:矩分析方法已用于决策分析,部分是为了避免涉及连续概率分布的决策模型可能遭受的计算负担。在贝叶斯线性(BL)方法中,使用不确定性(而不是概率)作为基本概念来指定对不确定量的事先判断。 BL奠定了De Finetti和Goldstein的工作基础,为力矩方法奠定了坚实的基础。本文的主要目的是讨论以何种方式可以以非贝叶斯的方式将矩量的专家评估结合起来,以构成先验评估。我们表明,线性池可以用与线性池类似的但在技术上不同的方式来证明概率评估的合理性,并且该线性池具有非常方便的属性:如果每个专家都对专家进行矩量评估,则线性池是一致的已经给出了连贯的评估。为了确定线性池的权重,我们提供了一种类似于库克经典模型的基于性能的加权方法,并探讨了其性能。最后,在经典模型的应用程序中收集的数据上,我们将其性能与经典模型进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号