首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >A Bayesian statistical method for quantifying model form uncertainty and two model combination methods
【24h】

A Bayesian statistical method for quantifying model form uncertainty and two model combination methods

机译:用于量化模型形式不确定性的贝叶斯统计方法和两种模型组合方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Apart from parametric uncertainty, model form uncertainty as well as prediction error may be involved in the analysis of engineering system. Model form uncertainty, inherently existing in selecting the best approximation from a model set cannot be ignored, especially when the predictions by competing models show significant differences. In this research, a methodology based on maximum likelihood estimation is presented to quantify model form uncertainty using the measured differences of experimental and model outcomes, and is compared with a fully Bayesian estimation to demonstrate its effectiveness. While a method called the adjustment factor approach is utilized to propagate model form uncertainty alone into the prediction of a system response, a method called model averaging is utilized to incorporate both model form uncertainty and prediction error into it. A numerical problem of concrete creep is used to demonstrate the processes for quantifying model form uncertainty and implementing the adjustment factor approach and model averaging. Finally, the presented methodology is applied to characterize the engineering benefits of a laser peening process.
机译:除参数不确定性外,工程系统的分析可能还涉及模型形式的不确定性以及预测误差。从模型集中选择最佳近似值时固有地存在的模型形式不确定性不能忽略,尤其是当竞争模型的预测显示出显着差异时。在这项研究中,提出了一种基于最大似然估计的方法,可以使用实验和模型结果的测量差异来量化模型形式的不确定性,并将其与完全贝叶斯估计进行比较以证明其有效性。虽然使用一种称为调整因子方法的方法将模型形式的不确定性单独传播到系统响应的预测中,但是使用一种称为模型平均的方法将模型形式的不确定性和预测误差都纳入其中。用混凝土蠕变的一个数值问题来说明量化模型形式不确定性,实现调整因子方法和模型平均的过程。最后,所提出的方法应用于表征激光喷丸工艺的工程优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号