...
首页> 外文期刊>River Research and Applications >EFFECTS OF GEOMORPHIC PROCESS DOMAINS ON RIVER ECOSYSTEMS: A COMPARISON OF FLOODPLAIN AND CONFINED VALLEY SEGMENTS
【24h】

EFFECTS OF GEOMORPHIC PROCESS DOMAINS ON RIVER ECOSYSTEMS: A COMPARISON OF FLOODPLAIN AND CONFINED VALLEY SEGMENTS

机译:地貌过程域对河流生态系统的影响:洪泛区和密闭河谷段的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The geomorphic template of streams and rivers exerts strong controls on the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems. However, relationships between stream geomorphology and ecosystem structure and function are not always clear and have not been investigated equally across spatial scales. In montane regions, rivers often alternate between canyon-confined segments and unconfined floodplain segments. Yet, few studies have evaluated how this pattern influences aquatic ecosystems. Here, we compared five confined river segments to five paired floodplain segments in terms of allochthonous inputs, aquatic primary producer and invertebrate production, stream retentive capacity, and aquatic invertebrate community composition. We found that floodplains had a higher (up to 4×) retentive capacity, a greater richness (58%) of aquatic invertebrates, and a distinctly different invertebrate community, relative to confined segments. Contrary to our expectations, allochthonous inputs were approximately 2× greater for confined segments, and aquatic primary and invertebrate production exhibited no consistent differences between segment types. However, results did indicate that floodplains had greater overall community respiration than confined segments. Together, these findings suggest that floodplain and confined segments do indeed differ in terms of aquatic ecosystem structure and function but not entirely as expected. Confined segments had greater allochthonous inputs but a lower capacity to retain those inputs, whereas floodplains had a high capacity to retain transported organic matter and also a more diverse community of invertebrates and higher overall community respiration to 'digest' retained organic matter. If these findings are generalizable, then they would indicate that confined segments are sources for organic matter within river networks, whereas floodplains act as filters, removing and processing organic matter transported from upstream confined segments.
机译:河流和河流的地貌模板对水生生态系统的结构和功能具有强大的控制作用。然而,河流地貌与生态系统结构和功能之间的关系并不总是很清楚,并且没有在空间尺度上进行同样的研究。在山区,河流经常在峡谷限制段和非限制洪泛区段之间交替。但是,很少有研究评估这种模式如何影响水生生态系统。在这里,我们在异源投入,水生初级生产者和无脊椎动物的生产,河流保持能力和水生无脊椎动物群落组成方面比较了五个密闭河段和五个成对洪泛区段。我们发现,相对于受限区域,洪泛区具有更高的(高达4倍)保留能力,水生无脊椎动物的丰富度更高(58%),并且无脊椎动物的种群明显不同。与我们的预期相反,密闭区域的异源输入约大2倍,而水生初级和无脊椎动物的生产在各区域类型之间没有一致的差异。但是,结果确实表明,洪泛区的整体呼吸作用要比密闭区更大。总之,这些发现表明,洪泛区和密闭区确实在水生生态系统结构和功能方面确实有所不同,但并不完全如预期的那样。狭窄区域的异源输入量较大,但保留这些输入量的能力较低,而洪泛区则具有较高的保留运输的有机物的能力,而且无脊椎动物的群落也更加多样化,并且对“消化”保留的有机物的整体呼吸作用也较高。如果这些发现是可推广的,那么它们将表明密闭网段是河流网络中有机物的来源,而洪泛区则充当过滤器,去除和处理从上游密闭网段运输的有机物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号