...
首页> 外文期刊>Regional science and urban economics >Economic returns to residential green building investment: The developers' perspective
【24h】

Economic returns to residential green building investment: The developers' perspective

机译:住宅绿色建筑投资的经济回报:开发商的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While many studies have shown that "green price premiums" accompany the development of green buildings, there is still significant doubt among the public as to the financial viability of investments in energy efficiency. In this paper, we examine this issue from the developers' perspective, and draw on data from Singapore's Green Mark (GM) system, which was introduced in 2005 to evaluate the sustainability and energy-efficiency of buildings. We find that the "green price premium" of residential developments arises largely during the resale phase, relative to the presale stage. The market premium of GM-rated units is about 10% at the resale stage, compared to about 4% during the presale stage. This implies that, while developers pay for almost all of the additional costs of energy efficiency during construction, they only share part of the benefits associated with such green investments. We also find no evidence that the development of green housing can immediately and significantly improve the corporate financial performance of Singaporean residential developers. These results provide the first evidence of the mismatch that developers face between outlays and benefits in the residential green building sector. This mismatch may impede further development of green residential properties. The emerging green real estate markets should be encouraged to introduce innovative business arrangements and financial products that allow residential developers to capture the future benefits associated with green properties.
机译:尽管许多研究表明,“绿色价格溢价”伴随着绿色建筑的发展,但公众仍对能源效率投资的财务可行性存有很大的疑问。在本文中,我们从开发商的角度审视了这个问题,并借鉴了新加坡绿色标志(GM)系统的数据,该系统于2005年引入,用于评估建筑物的可持续性和能源效率。我们发现,与预售阶段相比,住宅开发的“绿色价格溢价”主要出现在转售阶段。转售阶段通用汽车评级单位的市场溢价约为10%,而预售阶段约为4%。这意味着,尽管开发商在建造过程中几乎支付了所有额外的能源效率成本,但他们仅分享与此类绿色投资相关的部分收益。我们也没有证据表明绿色住房的开发可以立即并显着改善新加坡住宅开发商的企业财务业绩。这些结果为开发商在住宅绿色建筑领域的支出与收益之间不匹配提供了第一个证据。这种不匹配可能会阻碍绿色住宅物业的进一步发展。应鼓励新兴的绿色房地产市场引入创新的业务安排和金融产品,以使住宅开发商能够获取与绿色房地产相关的未来收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号