...
首页> 外文期刊>Regional science and urban economics >The effects of an 'urban village' planning and zoning strategy in San Jose, California
【24h】

The effects of an 'urban village' planning and zoning strategy in San Jose, California

机译:“城市村”规划与分区策略在圣何塞,加利福尼亚州的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Allowing mixed-use and higher-density development is a common municipal policy response to pressing urban challenges, including housing affordability and climate change. Yet, comparatively little is known about the effects of density-enabling plans and policies. We study how a major 2011 planning initiative, the designation of ?urban villages,? affected real estate development in San Jose, California. We track several outcome measures ? permits for residential and commercial development, large development projects, parcel transactions, and parcel assessed values ? before and after the urban village initiative. We find the initiative?s effects to be quite limited. The estimated treatment effects are generally not distinguishable from zero across specifications that vary by parcel land use, treatment period, and identification strategy. Potential explanations include a lack of actual zoning changes; urban village requirements that make development more complicated; and a mismatch between the development types envisioned in municipal plans and real estate market conditions.
机译:允许混合使用和更高密度的发展是对压迫城市挑战的常见的市政政策,包括住房负担能力和气候变化。然而,相对较少地了解了抗议计划和政策的影响。我们研究了2011年大型计划计划,指定何种主要村庄,城市村庄,?影响加利福尼亚州圣何塞的房地产开发。我们跟踪几种结果措施?允许住宅和商业开发,大型开发项目,包裹交易和包裹评估价值观吗?在城市村庄的倡议之前和之后。我们发现主动性的效果非常有限。估计的治疗效果通常不区分,这些规范因包裹土地利用,治疗期和识别策略而异。潜在的解释包括缺乏实际分区变化;城市村要求使发展更加复杂;在市政计划和房地产市场条件下设想的开发类型之间的不匹配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号