首页> 外文期刊>Refocus >Performance evaluation and economic feasibility of a solar-biomass hybrid greenhouse dryer for drying Banana slices
【24h】

Performance evaluation and economic feasibility of a solar-biomass hybrid greenhouse dryer for drying Banana slices

机译:用于烘干香蕉切片的太阳能生物量混合温室烘干机的性能评估和经济可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A greenhouse dryer consisting of drying chamber, drying trays, biomass unit and heat exchanger was used in this study. Three energy modes were considered namely solar, biomass and solar-biomass. The dryer performance was evaluated based on drying air properties, drying rates, energy efficiency, energy utilization and exergy efficiency. During drying, the temperature difference between inside and outside was found to be 12.96±5.25, 8.88±1.38 and 13.21±6.21°C for solar, biomass and solar-biomass modes, respectively. This had a corresponding relative humidity difference of 8.76±8.28, 24.26±8.83 and 27.51±10.24%, respectively. The mean drying rates were found to be 0.28±0.04, 0.21±0.03 and 0.23±0.06 g/gdm/hour for solar, biomass and solar-biomass modes, respectively. The results showed significant difference between means of the drying rates of banana slices for the three energy modes. Further analysis showed insignificant difference between drying rates of solar and solar-biomass as well as biomass and solar-biomass. Energy efficiency and exergy efficiency for solar mode were found to be lower than that of biomass and solar-biomass modes. In addition, average energy utilization ratio in the greenhouse dryer was noted as 35.58±24.78, 40.60±10.52 and 33.46±13.45% for solar, biomass and solar-biomass modes, respectively. The corresponding average hourly exergy efficiency of drying air was found to be 64.60±24.78, 59.37±10.52 and 66.50±13.47%, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the exergy efficiency of drying air for the three energy modes used. The payback period of the dryer was found to be <1 year which is lower than expected life of the dryer (4 years).
机译:在本研究中使用了由干燥室,干燥托盘,生物质单元和热交换器组成的温室烘干机。三种能量模式被认为是太阳能,生物质和太阳能生物量。基于干燥空气性能,干燥率,能效,能源利用和高效效率来评估干燥器性能。在干燥过程中,对于太阳能,生物质和太阳能生物量模式,内外和外部之间的温差分别为12.96±5.25,8.88±1.38和13.21±6.21°C。这具有相应的相对湿度差异为8.76±8.28,24.26±8.83和27.51±10.24%。对于太阳能,生物质和太阳能生物量模式,均为平均干燥率为0.28±0.04,0.21±0.03和0.23±0.06g / gdm /小时。结果表明,三种能量模式的香蕉切片的烘干率之间的差异显着。进一步的分析表明,太阳能和太阳能生物量的干燥率以及生物量和太阳能生物质之间的微不足道的差异。发现太阳能模式的能量效率和高级效率低于生物质和太阳能生物量模式的效率。此外,温室干燥器中的平均能量利用率分别指出为太阳能,生物质和太阳能生物量模式的35.58±24.78,40.60±10.52和33.46±13.45%。发现干燥空气的相应平均普通效率分别为64.60±24.78,59.37±10.52和66.50±13.47%。用于使用三种能量模式的干燥空气的Deervent效率之间没有统计差异。烘干机的回收期是<1年,低于干燥器的寿命(4年)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Refocus》 |2020年第9期|60-68|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology P.O. Box 62000-00200 Nairobi Kenya;

    Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology P.O. Box 62000-00200 Nairobi Kenya;

    Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology P.O. Box 62000-00200 Nairobi Kenya;

    Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology P.O. Box 62000-00200 Nairobi Kenya;

    Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology P.O. Box 62000-00200 Nairobi Kenya;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号