首页> 外文期刊>Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives >Feedback on teachers' journal entries: a blessing or a curse?
【24h】

Feedback on teachers' journal entries: a blessing or a curse?

机译:对教师日记条目的反馈:是福是祸?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Giving feedback on journal entries in the context of teacher education programmes is a contested issue. While some educationists argue that it is necessary if Course Participants (CPs) have to conceptualise the complex process of reflective journaling, others argue that this has ethical implications that may curtail CPs from achieving critical analysis level of events, issues and situations leading to deeper reflections - one of the goals of feedback. This study sought to find out why, despite feedback being given on teachers' journal entries during the Certificate of Education Programmes, they fail to move from the descriptive to analytical stage of deeper reflections. This was done by exploring teachers' perceptions and experiences of feedback on their journal entries. This study established that teachers did not appreciate, and resented the feedback given on their journal entries. They expressed that the feedback and the way it was given not only discouraged them from journaling, but also made them feel de‐motivated, thus, incompetent in the activity of reflective journaling. Hence feedback failed to achieve its goal of enhancing teachers' deeper reflections
机译:在教师教育计划的背景下提供期刊录入反馈是一个有争议的问题。尽管有些教育学家认为课程参与者(CP)必须将反思日记的复杂过程概念化,但另一些教育学家认为这具有伦理学涵义,这可能会使CP不能达到对事件,问题和情况的关键分析水平,从而导致更深刻的思考-反馈的目标之一。这项研究试图找出原因,尽管在“教育证书计划”期间收到了有关教师日记条目的反馈,但他们却未能从描述性阶段转向分析性阶段。这是通过探索教师对日记条目的看法和反馈经验来完成的。这项研究确定了老师们不赞赏,并讨厌他们对日记条目的反馈。他们表示,反馈及其提供的方式不仅使他们不愿使用日志,而且使他们感到动力不足,因此,他们在反思性日志的活动上不称职。因此,反馈未能实现其增强教师深层思考的目标

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号