...
首页> 外文期刊>Reeves journal >Prompt Payment Penalties Precis An executive review of what you need to know
【24h】

Prompt Payment Penalties Precis An executive review of what you need to know

机译:及时的罚款处罚Precis对您需要了解的内容进行行政审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There have been a few cases during the past few years that affect the Prompt Pay Laws. The cases really do not support applying prompt pay penalties except where there is absolutely no dispute over the unpaid amount due or the work. We often hear of contractors claiming they are entitled to 24 percent on unpaid balances because of these laws and, usually, their position is contrary to the law. Thus, we thought it was important to give an overview of where these laws are today.
机译:在过去几年中,有几起案件影响了《及时付款法》。这些案例确实不支持立即支付薪水罚款,除非绝对没有应付的欠款或工作争议。我们经常听到承包商声称由于这些法律,他们有权获得24%的未付余额,而且通常情况下,他们的立场是违反法律的。因此,我们认为重要的是要概述这些法律的今天。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Reeves journal》 |2013年第1期|8-9|共2页
  • 作者

    Bruce D. Rudman;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号