首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information
【24h】

Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information

机译:英国地方政府的记录管理:信息自由的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - University College London (UCL) ran a research project over 12 months in 2008-2009, funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council, which examined what the impact of the UK Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000 had been on records management services in local government. This paper aims to report on some of the findings of the study, with a focus on the practical records management issues. Design/methodology/approach - The research considered the three perspectives of records managers: institutional FOI; policy managers; and FOI requestors and user communities. Following an extensive literature review, qualitative research methods were used to gather data, specifically semi-structured interviewing of 27 individuals from 19 different institutions in London and the South East of England and with 11 requestors. Findings - The findings reported in this paper focus on records services in local government, in particular their organisational location and status, and aspects of the management of current and non-current records, including those in digital formats. Research limitations/implications - This paper is one of the outputs of a grant-funded project, which documents the results of research in FOI from a records management perspective and makes a contribution to the wider debate about access to information. It attempts to survey user responses, which has been an overlooked aspect of other FOI and records management research. Practical implications - There are some implications for good practice in records management policy and systems and in the location of records functions in local government. Originality/value - Local government is an under-researched field in respect of information management and FOI, when compared with other parts of the public sector, and this is therefore a significant contribution to knowledge in this field.
机译:目的-伦敦大学学院(UCL)在2008年至2009年期间进行了为期12个月的研究项目,该研究项目由英国艺术与人文研究理事会(UK Arts and Humanities Research Council)资助,审查了《英国2000年信息自由(FOI)法案》的影响地方政府的管理服务。本文旨在报告该研究的一些发现,重点是实际记录管理问题。设计/方法/方法-研究考虑了记录管理者的三个观点:机构FOI;政策经理;以及FOI请求者和用户社区。经过广泛的文献综述,使用定性研究方法来收集数据,特别是对来自伦敦和英格兰东南部的19个不同机构的27个人的半结构化访谈以及11个请求者。调查结果-本文报告的调查结果集中于地方政府的记录服务,尤其是其组织位置和地位,以及当前和非当前记录(包括数字格式记录)的管理方面。研究的局限性/意义-本文是一项受资助项目的结果之一,该项目从记录管理的角度记录了FOI的研究结果,并为有关信息获取的广泛辩论做出了贡献。它试图调查用户的响应,而这是其他FOI和记录管理研究中被忽视的方面。实际意义-良好的做法在档案管理政策和系统以及地方政府中档案职能的位置上有一些意义。原创性/价值-与公共部门的其他部门相比,地方政府在信息管理和FOI方面处于研究不足的领域,因此,这是对该领域知识的重大贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号