首页> 外文期刊>The rand journal of economics >Best foot forward or best for last in a sequential auction?
【24h】

Best foot forward or best for last in a sequential auction?

机译:在连续拍卖中最好走还是最后走?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Should a seller with private information sell the best or worst goods first? Considering the sequential auction of two stochastically equivalent goods, we find that the seller has an incentive to impress buyers by selling the better good first because the seller's sequencing strategy endoge-nously generates correlation in the values of the goods across periods. When this impression effect is strong enough, selling the better good first is the unique pure-strategy equilibrium. By credibly revealing to all buyers the seller's ranking of the goods, an equilibrium strategy of sequencing the goods reduces buyer information rents and increases expected revenues in accordance with the linkage principle.
机译:具有私人信息的卖家应该首先出售最好的还是最差的商品?考虑到两个随机相等的货物的顺序拍卖,我们发现卖方有动机通过首先出售更好的商品来打动买方,因为卖方的排序策略会在各个时期内内在地产生货物价值的相关性。当这种印象效果足够强大时,首先卖出更好的商品就是独特的纯策略均衡。通过向所有买方可靠地显示卖方对货物的排名,按照链接原则对货物进行排序的均衡策略减少了买方的信息租金并增加了预期收入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号