首页> 外文期刊>Railway Track and Structures >Ask John Report: Timber cap replacement
【24h】

Ask John Report: Timber cap replacement

机译:询问约翰报告:更换木帽

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Thanks to all of the AREMA Committee 10 and 7 members for their assistance in preparing this report. Today's rail traffic has seen an increase in both load limits and track speeds. One result of this trend is the record number of timber pile cap failures. To be sure, these caps can be replaced in-situ as shown below, but it is critical to ask why they are failing. Timber bridges have a useful life expectancy of approximately 60 years or longer and components of older bridges are naturally deteriorating and must be replaced. However, many of the timber caps are failing in shear and many of those are newer timbers. While some might argue that new timber caps do not have the structural strength required for today's loading and should be replaced with concrete caps, are there other factors that need to be considered?
机译:感谢AREMA委员会10和7全体成员在编写本报告方面的协助。当今的铁路运输量限制和轨道速度都在增加。这一趋势的结果是木材桩帽失效的数量创下了记录。可以肯定的是,可以按如下所示就地更换这些保护盖,但是至关重要的是要问一下它们为什么会失效。木桥的预期使用寿命约为60年或更长时间,旧桥的部件会自然退化,必须更换。但是,许多木材帽不能剪切,其中许多是较新的木材。尽管有人可能会争辩说新的木帽不具备当今负荷所需要的结构强度,应该用混凝土帽代替,但还有其他因素需要考虑吗?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Railway Track and Structures》 |2016年第6期|48-49|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:22:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号