首页> 外文期刊>Rail International >Whose infrastructure?
【24h】

Whose infrastructure?

机译:谁的基础设施?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It has been more than ten years since substantial attention began to get focused on the realities of rail transportation in the framework of a level playing field for all modes of transportation. The primary focus was to rectify the inequalities by which railroads must account for costs involved in their infrastructure. By contrast, the other modes benefit by the governmental infrastructures of the open road, the open skies, and the open waterways. It was in 1991 that a milepost decision was made by the European Community in its EC Directive 91/440 to separate the railroad infrastructure from operations amongst its member countries. However, the ink was hardly dry on that important decision and the need for alterations in the Directive itself became evident. It also was in 1991 that the U.S. government made as law its Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act, or ISTEA. It addressed the same problem and now has replaced "Efficiency" with "Equity" in the designation of the Act.
机译:自从在所有运输方式的公平竞争环境的框架内开始将大量注意力集中于铁路运输的现实以来,已有十多年的历史了。主要重点是纠正不平等现象,铁路必须通过这些不平等因素来考虑其基础设施所涉及的成本。相比之下,其他方式受益于开放道路,开放天空和开放水道的政府基础设施。 1991年,欧洲共同体在其EC指令91/440中做出了一个里程碑式的决定,将铁路基础设施与其成员国之间的运营区分开来。但是,在这个重要的决定上,油墨几乎没有干dry,并且对指令本身进行更改的需求变得显而易见。也是在1991年,美国政府将《多式联运地面运输效率法》(简称ISTEA)作为法律。它解决了同样的问题,现在在该法令的指定中用“平等”代替了“效率”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号