...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendonitis: Short-term and 10-year Outcomes after Two-Needle US-guided Percutaneous Treatment— Nonrandomizedn Controlled Trial
【24h】

Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendonitis: Short-term and 10-year Outcomes after Two-Needle US-guided Percutaneous Treatment— Nonrandomizedn Controlled Trial

机译:肩袖钙化性肌腱炎:两针美国引导下经皮治疗后的短期和10年结果—非随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To compare short- and long-term outcomes of patients with rotator cuff calcific tendonitis who did and did not undergo ultrasonographically (US)-guided percutaneous treatment. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained. Of patients referred for US-guided treatment of rotator cuff calcific tendonitis, 219 (86 men, 133 women; mean age, 40.3 years ± 10.9 [standard deviation]) were treated; 68 (31 men, 37 women; mean age, 40.2 years ± 11.3) patients refused treatment and served as control subjects. After local anesthesia was induced, two 16-gauge needles were inserted into the calcific deposit. Saline solution was injected through one needle, and the dissolved calcium was extracted through the other needle. Shoulder joint function was assessed by using Constant scores, and pain was assessed by using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests were performed. Results: At baseline, no significant difference in age or sex distribution, Constant score, or VAS score was detected between treated and nontreated (control) patients. Compared with control subjects, treated patients reported a significant decrease in symptoms at 1 month (mean Constant score, 73.2 ± 6.2 vs 57.5 ± 3.9; mean VAS score, 4.8 ± 0.6 vs 9.1 ± 0.5), 3 months (mean Constant score, 90.2 ± 2.6 vs 62.6 ± 7.2; mean VAS score, 3.3 ± 0.4 vs 7.3 ± 1.8), and 1 year (mean Constant score, 91.7 ± 3.1 vs 78.4 ± 9.5; mean VAS score, 2.7 ± 0.5 vs 4.5 ± 0.9) (P < .001). Symptom scores were not significantly different between the groups at 5 years (mean Constant score, 90.9 ± 3.6 vs 90.5 ± 4.8; mean VAS score, 2.6 ± 0.5 vs 2.8 ± 0.7) (P ≥ .795) and 10 years (mean Constant score, 91.8 ± 5.0 vs 91.3 ± 9.6; mean VAS score, 2.5 ± 0.6 vs 2.7 ± 0.6) (P ≥ .413). Conclusion: US-guided percutaneous treatment facilitated prompt shoulder function recovery and pain relief. Treated patients had better outcomes than did nontreated patients at 1 year. However, 5 and 10 years after the procedure, the nontreated group reported outcomes similar to those of the treated group. © RSNA, 2009
机译:目的:比较接受和未接受超声引导下经皮治疗的肩袖钙化性肌腱炎患者的短期和长期结局。材料和方法:获得机构审查委员会的批准和知情患者的同意。在接受美国指导的肩袖钙化性肌腱炎治疗的患者中,有219例(男性86例,女性133例;平均年龄40.3岁±10.9 [标准差])得到治疗; 68名患者(31名男性,37名女性;平均年龄,40.2岁±11.3)拒绝治疗并作为对照组。诱导局部麻醉后,将两个16号针头插入钙化沉积物中。通过一根针头注入盐溶液,并通过另一根针头提取溶解的钙。通过使用Constant评分评估肩关节功能,通过使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估疼痛。进行了Mann-Whitney U和χ 2 测试。结果:在基线时,治疗和未治疗(对照)患者之间的年龄或性别分布,恒定评分或VAS评分均无显着差异。与对照组相比,接受治疗的患者在1个月时的症状显着减轻(平均常数评分,分别为73.2±6.2和57.5±3.9;平均VAS评分,4.8±0.6和9.1±0.5),三个月(平均常数,得分90.2) ±2.6 vs 62.6±7.2;平均VAS评分,3.3±0.4 vs 7.3±1.8)和1年(平均常数评分,91.7±3.1 vs 78.4±9.5;平均VAS评分,2.7±0.5 vs 4.5±0.9)(P <.001)。各组在5年时的症状评分无显着差异(平均常数评分,分别为90.9±3.6和90.5±4.8;平均VAS分数,分别为2.6±0.5和2.8±0.7)(P≥.795)和10年(平均常数评分,分别为91.8±5.0和91.3±9.6; VAS平均得分为2.5±0.6和2.7±0.6)(P≥.413)。结论:美国指导的经皮治疗有助于迅速恢复肩部功能和缓解疼痛。在1年时,接受治疗的患者比未接受治疗的患者有更好的结局。但是,在手术后5年和10年,未治疗组的结局与治疗组相似。 ©RSNA,2009年

著录项

  • 来源
    《Radiology》 |2009年第1期|p.157-164|共8页
  • 作者单位

    From the Unit of Radiology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 2 Savonese, Ospedale Santa Corona, Via XXV Aprile 38, 17027 Pietra Ligure, Italy (G.S., F.L.);

    Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy (L.M.S., A.A., F.S.);

    and Unit of Radiology, Ospedale Evangelico Internazionale, Genova, Italy (E.S.). Received October 13, 2008;

    revision requested December 4;

    revision received December 15;

    accepted January 25, 2009;

    final version accepted February 9.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号