...
首页> 外文期刊>Radio Science >Comparison of wind estimation errors for the spaced antenna technique: A case study for the MU radar
【24h】

Comparison of wind estimation errors for the spaced antenna technique: A case study for the MU radar

机译:间隔天线技术的风估计误差比较:以MU雷达为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we estimate the random errors in the spaced antenna (SA) winds by two techniques and compare them with measurements made by the Doppler technique. With a one spatial dimension computer simulation, we apply typical parameters for the middle and upper atmosphere (MU) radar without noise. Briggs' [1984] full correlation analysis (FCA) is commonly applied to the SA technique, while Doviak et al. [1996] and Holloway et al. [1997] used another simple analytic form based on scattering theory to derive generalized expressions. This simple analytic form should have equivalent results to the Briggs FCA for the horizontal wind estimation. With our simulation results, this form generally shows similar results to the FCA, and sometimes shows better performance than the FCA although it needs simpler calculation than the FCA. The estimation error of this simple analytic form is better than that of the Doppler for large wind, and better than that of the FCA for small antenna spacing. MU radar observations are compared with these two analyses for the SA technique, and the simple analytic form also shows similar performance to the FCA.
机译:在本文中,我们通过两种技术估算间隔天线(SA)中的随机误差,并将其与多普勒技术的测量结果进行比较。通过一维空间计算机仿真,我们将中噪声和无噪声雷达应用于典型参数。 Briggs [1984]的全相关分析(FCA)通常被应用到SA技术中,而Doviak等人(1984)。 [1996]和Holloway等。 [1997]使用另一种基于散射理论的简单解析形式来推导广义表达式。这种简单的分析形式应具有与Briggs FCA等效的水平风估算结果。根据我们的仿真结果,这种形式通常显示出与FCA类似的结果,并且有时需要比FCA更好的性能,尽管它需要比FCA更简单的计算。对于大风,这种简单分析形式的估计误差要优于多普勒,对于小天线间隔,其估计误差要比FCA好。将MU雷达的观测结果与这两种用于SA技术的分析进行比较,并且简单的分析形式也显示出与FCA类似的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号