...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation Protection Dosimetry >AN INVESTIGATION INTO CT RADIATION DOSE VARIATIONS FOR HEAD EXAMINATIONS ON MATCHED EQUIPMENT
【24h】

AN INVESTIGATION INTO CT RADIATION DOSE VARIATIONS FOR HEAD EXAMINATIONS ON MATCHED EQUIPMENT

机译:配套设备的头部检查的CT辐射剂量变化的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated radiation dose and image quality differences for computed tomography (CT) head examinations across centres with matched CT equipment. Radiation dose records and imaging protocols currently employed across three European university teaching hospitals were collated, compared and coded as Centres A, B and C from specification matched CT equipment models. Patient scans (n = 40) obtained from Centres A and C were evaluated for image quality, based on the visualisation of Commission of European Community (CEC) image quality criteria using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis, where American Board of Radiology examiners (n = 11) stated their confidence in identifying anatomical criteria. Mean doses in terms of CT dose index (CTDI_vol-mGy) and dose length product (DLP-mGy cm) were as follows: Centre A-33.12 mGy and 461.45 mGy cm; Centre B -101 mGy (base)/32 mGy (cerebrum) and 762 mGy cm and Centre C-71.98 mGy and 1047.26 mGy cm, showing a significant difference (p≤0.05) in DLP across centres. VGC analysis indicated better visualisation of CEC criteria on Centre C images (VGC_Auc 0.225). All three imaging protocols are routinely used clinically, and image quality is acceptable in each centre. Clinical centres with identical model CT scanners have variously customised their protocols achieving a range of dose savings and still resulting in clinically acceptable image quality.
机译:这项研究调查了使用匹配的CT设备在各个中心进行计算机断层扫描(CT)头部检查时的辐射剂量和图像质量差异。根据规范匹配的CT设备模型,对目前在欧洲三所大学教学医院中使用的辐射剂量记录和成像协议进行了整理,比较和编码为A,B和C中心。根据欧洲共同体委员会(CEC)图像质量标准的可视化,使用视觉分级特征(VGC)分析,对从A中心和C中心获得的患者扫描图像(n = 40)进行了图像质量评估,其中美国放射学检查委员会( n = 11)表示他们对确定解剖学标准的信心。根据CT剂量指数(CTDI_vol-mGy)和剂量长度乘积(DLP-mGy cm)的平均剂量如下:中心A-33.12 mGy和461.45 mGy cm;中心B -101 mGy(基础)/ 32 mGy(大脑)和762 mGy cm,以及中心C-71.98 mGy和1047.26 mGy cm,显示各个中心之间DLP的显着差异(p≤0.05)。 VGC分析表明中心C图像(VGC_Auc 0.225)上CEC标准的可视化效果更好。所有这三种成像方案都是临床常规使用的,并且每个中心的图像质量都是可以接受的。具有相同型号CT扫描仪的临床中心已对它们的方案进行了各种自定义,以实现一系列的剂量节省,并仍然产生临床上可接受的图像质量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Radiation Protection Dosimetry 》 |2016年第4期| 466-474| 共9页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiography, University of Malta, Msida, Malta;

    Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield Dublin 4, Ireland;

    CONRAD-Radiographic Research Center, University College Lillebaelt, Blangstedgaardsvej 4, 5220 Odense, Denmark;

    Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield Dublin 4, Ireland;

    American Board of Radiology, 5441 East Williams Boulevard, Suite 200, Tucson, AZ, USA;

    Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield Dublin 4, Ireland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号