首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Testing a logic tree approach for archaeoseismology to the ancient city of Pinara(SW Turkey)
【24h】

Testing a logic tree approach for archaeoseismology to the ancient city of Pinara(SW Turkey)

机译:测试皮纳拉古城(西南土耳其)考古学的逻辑树方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Geologists, seismologists, as well as archaeologists increasingly apply archaeoseismological investigations to study possible natural causes of damage of a site and to assess the regional seismic hazard risks. Archaeoseismological investigations enable the obtaining of diverse data on past earthquakes and allow for an application of different methods. Furthermore, archaeoseismology provides the opportunity to study past earthquakes in regions where limited instrumental and historical data are available. Therefore, this approach contributes to a regional assessment of seismic hazard. The increasing application and importance of archaeoseismology requires a comprehensive and systematic approach. The logic tree methodology for archaeoseismology is an evaluation method which offers a standard procedure to identify and evaluate archaeoseismological information and to provide comparable values for seismic hazard assessment. This study tests the logic tree methodology for archaeoseismology to Pinara to assess the city's potential to have recorded earthquakes, and the methodology's value. The ancient city of Pinara (SW Turkey, 500 BC-900 AD) is situated in the Esen basin in the southern extremity of the seismically active Fethiye-Burdur fault zone. The present seismic quiescence of the Esen basin contradicts the geological and historical records which indicate that fault and earthquake activity must have been recurrent. With the application of the logic tree approach to Pinara, geological and archaeoseismological evidence of seismic activity is evaluated in six stages. The end solution of the logic tree provides a value between 0 and 1. This archaeological quality factor (AQF) reflects the reliability and relative significance of Pinara for archaeoseismological investigation and seismic hazard assessment respectively. Pinara's preferred end solution (P_(e5I)) of 0.06 and the AQF of 0.12 are obtained by the logic tree method and reflect the high probability of recorded palaeoearthquakes in Pinara. In sum, the logic tree for archaeoseismology provides a concept with reliable criteria to assess the earthquake hypothesis in general, and the findings suggest the assumed low seismic hazard potential of this area needs serious reconsideration.
机译:地质学家,地震学家和考古学家越来越多地应用考古地震学调查来研究可能造成场地破坏的自然原因,并评估区域地震灾害的风险。考古地震学调查可以获取有关过去地震的各种数据,并可以应用不同的方法。此外,考古地震学为研究仪器和历史数据有限的地区的过去地震提供了机会。因此,这种方法有助于对地震危害进行区域评估。考古学的不断增长的应用和重要性要求采用全面而系统的方法。考古地震学的逻辑树方法是一种评估方法,它提供了识别和评估考古地震信息并为地震危险性评估提供可比值的标准程序。这项研究测试了Pinara考古学的逻辑树方法,以评估该城市记录地震的潜力以及该方法的价值。皮纳拉(Pinara)古城(土耳其西南,公元前500年至公元前900年)位于地震活跃的费特希耶-布尔杜尔断裂带南端的埃森盆地。当前埃森盆地的地震静止状态与地质和历史记录相矛盾,后者表明断层和地震活动必定是反复发生的。通过将逻辑树方法应用于Pinara,在六个阶段中评估了地震活动的地质和考古地震证据。逻辑树的最终解决方案提供0到1之间的值。此考古质量因子(AQF)分别反映了Pinara在考古地震学调查和地震灾害评估中的可靠性和相对重要性。 Pinara的首选最终解决方案(P_(e5I))为0.06,AQF为0.12,这是通过逻辑树方法获得的,反映了Pinara地区记录的古地震的高概率。总而言之,考古学的逻辑树为总体地震假设的评估提供了一个具有可靠标准的概念,研究结果表明,该地区假定的低地震危险潜力需要认真考虑。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2011年第1期|p.52-64|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for Geology, Mineralogy and Geophysics, Ruhr University, Universitaetsstrasse 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany;

    TNO Built Environment and Geosciences, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA, The Netherlands;

    Geodynamics & Geofluids Research Group, Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, K.U. Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号