首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Trampled under foot: A quartz and chert human trampling experiment at the Cova del Parco rock shelter, Spain
【24h】

Trampled under foot: A quartz and chert human trampling experiment at the Cova del Parco rock shelter, Spain

机译:踩在脚下:西班牙Cova del Parco岩石掩体进行的石英和and石人类践踏实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An assemblage of 500 (385 quartz and 115 chert) experimentally knapped artefacts, underwent human trampling over the course of two weeks by a team of 10-12 excavators wearing soft-soled shoes used while excavating in the rock shelter. Two zones of trampling were used: Zone 1, a high artefact density, low trampling intensity, and lower soil compaction and rockiness; and Zone 2, a low artefact density, high trampling intensity, higher soil compaction and rockiness. The primary questions were to understand the difference in fracture rates and types between the chert and quartz, and the difference between the zones of artefact density, trampling intensity, and soil density. The results have shown that significantly more quartz fractured and were damaged compared to chert, and for both materials there was significantly more breakage in the zone with the higher trampling intensity and higher soil compaction and rockiness. There was no discerned association between the original artefacts' size or weight and the occurrence of breakage of the quartz and chert artefacts, except for a very weak association for narrower and thinner quartz artefacts being more likely to break. Overall, there was relatively little horizontal or vertical movement of the artefacts over the two weeks, with the largest size ranges moving the most, but with no significant difference in the movement of artefacts amongst the smaller size ranges. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:一组500头(385石英和115 cher石)经过实验折断的人工制品,由10至12名穿着软底鞋的挖掘机团队在两周的时间内进行了人类践踏,这些鞋在岩石掩体中挖掘时使用。使用了两个踩踏区:第1区,人造物密度高,踩踏强度低,土壤压实度和岩石度较低;和2区,人造物密度低,踩踏强度高,土壤压实度高和多岩石。主要问题是要了解到硅质石英石和石英之间的断裂速率和类型的差异,以及人工制品密度,践踏强度和土壤密度区域之间的差异。结果表明,与石相比,石英的破裂和破坏明显更多,对于这两种材料,践踏强度更高,土壤压实度和岩石度更高,则该区域的破碎率也更高。原始文物的大小或重量与石英和石文物的破损之间没有可辨别的关联,只是对于较窄和较薄的石英文物更有可能破裂的关联非常弱。总体而言,在两周内,文物的水平或垂直移动相对较少,最大尺寸范围的移动最大,但是在较小尺寸范围内,文物的移动没有​​显着差异。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号