首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly review of economics and finance >Do the pure martingale and joint normality hypotheses hold for futures contracts? Implications for the optimal hedge ratios
【24h】

Do the pure martingale and joint normality hypotheses hold for futures contracts? Implications for the optimal hedge ratios

机译:纯mar和联合正态性假设是否适用于期货合约?最佳套期保值比率的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is well known that the optimal hedge ratios derived based on the mean-variance approach, the expected utility maximizing approach, the mean extended-Gini approach, and the generalized semivariance approach will all converge to the minimum-variance hedge ratio if the futures price follows a pure martingale process and if the spot and futures returns are jointly normal. In this paper, we perform empirical tests to see if the pure martingale and joint normality hypotheses hold using 25 different futures contracts and five different hedging horizons. Our results indicate that the pure martingale hypothesis holds for all commodities and all hedging horizons except for three stock index futures contracts. As for joint normality, we propose two new tests based on the generalized method of moments, which allow for calculating multivariate test statistics that take account of the contemporaneous correlation across spot and futures returns. Our findings show that the joint normality hypothesis generally does not hold except for a few contracts and relatively long hedging horizons.
机译:众所周知,如果期货价格上涨,则基于均值方差法,预期效用最大化方法,均值扩展基尼法和广义半方差法得出的最优对冲比率都将收敛至最小方差对冲比率。遵循纯mar过程,并且现货和期货收益共同正常。在本文中,我们进行了实证检验,以使用25种不同的期货合约和5种不同的对冲范围来观察纯mar和联合正态性假设是否成立。我们的结果表明,除了三个股指期货合约之外,所有商品和所有对冲范围都适用纯mar假设。关于联合正态性,我们基于矩量的广义方法提出了两个新的检验,这些检验可以考虑到现货和期货收益的同时相关性来计算多元检验统计量。我们的发现表明,除了少数合同和相对长的对冲期以外,联合正态性假设通常不成立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号