首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Pure martingale and joint normality tests for energy futures contracts
【24h】

Pure martingale and joint normality tests for energy futures contracts

机译:能源期货合约的纯mar和联合正态性检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this study, we empirically analyze to see if the pure martingale hypothesis holds for three energy-related commodities: crude oil, heating oil and natural gas. We also test this hypothesis for five different hedging horizons: 1-day, 1-week, 4-week, 8-week and 12-week. Our empirical results show that the pure martingale hypothesis holds for all three commodities and all five horizons. This implies that the expected return on futures contract can be ignored in determining the optimal hedge ratio. We also test to see if the joint normality between futures and spot returns holds for the same three commodities and five hedging horizons. We reject the joint normality hypothesis for all three commodities and five hedging horizons. This implies that hedgers with different utility function have different optimal hedge ratios. Thus, in general, one needs to take into account of hedger's utility function when deriving optimal hedge ratio. Our results are robust to pre- and post-financial crisis as well as some other specifications considered in the paper. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,我们进行了经验分析,以了解纯mar假说是否适用于三种与能源相关的商品:原油,取暖油和天然气。我们还针对五个不同的对冲范围测试了该假设:1天,1周,4周,8周和12周。我们的经验结果表明,纯mar假设适用于所有三种商品和所有五个范围。这意味着在确定最佳对冲比率时可以忽略期货合约的预期收益。我们还测试了期货和现货收益之间的联合正态性是否对于相同的三种商品和五个对冲范围也成立。我们拒绝所有三种商品和五个对冲范围的联合正态性假设。这意味着具有不同效用函数的套期保值者具有不同的最佳套期保值比率。因此,一般而言,在推导最佳对冲比率时,需要考虑对冲工具的效用函数。我们的结果对于金融前后的危机以及本文中考虑的其他一些指标都非常可靠。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号