首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly review of economics and finance >The nonlinear ARDL approach and productivity bias hypothesis: Evidence from 68 countries
【24h】

The nonlinear ARDL approach and productivity bias hypothesis: Evidence from 68 countries

机译:非线性ARDL方法和生产率偏见假设:来自68个国家的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we test the Productivity Bias Hypothesis for each of the 68 countries for which we were able to collect data. When we used the linear ARDL approach, we found support for the hypothesis in 16 countries in the long run. However, when we used the nonlinear ARDL approach, we added 11 more countries to the list. Furthermore, the nonlinear approach supported the short-run asymmetric effects of productivity ratio in 47 countries that lasted into long run asymmetric effects in 29 countries in the sample. Seventeen additional countries were added to the list when both models were augmented with a few additional determinants of the real exchange rate.(c) 2021 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们测试了我们能够收集数据的68个国家中的每一个的生产力偏见假设。 当我们使用线性ARDL方法时,我们发现长期以来为16个国家的假设支持。 但是,当我们使用非线性ARDL方法时,我们将更多国家添加到列表中。 此外,非线性方法支持47个国家的生产率比的短期不对称效果,持续在样本中29个国家的长期不对称效应。 当两种模型增加了少数额外的汇率决定因素时,将十七个其他国家加入到列表中。(c)伊利诺伊大学的2021委员会。 由elsevier Inc.保留所有权利发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号