...
首页> 外文期刊>The Quarterly Journal of Economics >Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving*
【24h】

Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving*

机译:测试慈善捐赠中的利他行为和社会压力*

获取原文

摘要

Every year, 90% of Americans give money to charities. Is such generosity necessarily welfare enhancing for the giver? We present a theoretical framework that distinguishes two types of motivation: individuals like to give, for example, due to altruism or warm glow, and individuals would rather not give but dislike saying no, for example, due to social pressure. We design a door-to-door fund-raiser in which some households are informed about the exact time of solicitation with a flyer on their doorknobs. Thus, they can seek or avoid the fund-raiser. We find that the flyer reduces the share of households opening the door by 9% to 25% and, if the flyer allows checking a Do Not Disturb box, reduces giving by 28% to 42%. The latter decrease is concentrated among donations smaller than $10. These findings suggest that social pressure is an important determinant of door-to-door giving. Combining data from this and a complementary field experiment, we structurally estimate the model. The estimated social pressure cost of saying no to a solicitor is $3.80 for an in-state charity and $1.40 for an out-of-state charity. Our welfare calculations suggest that our door-to-door fund-raising campaigns on average lower the utility of the potential donors.
机译:每年,有90%的美国人向慈善机构捐款。这样慷慨大方是否一定会给施舍者带来福利?我们提出了一种区分两种动机的理论框架:例如,由于利他主义或温暖的光芒,个人喜欢给予,而由于社会压力,个人宁愿不给予但不喜欢拒绝。我们设计了一个门到门的募捐活动,其中一些家庭的门把手上有传单,告知他们确切的募捐时间。因此,他们可以寻求或避免筹款活动。我们发现,传单将开门家庭的比例降低了9%至25%,如果传单允许选中“请勿打扰”框,则捐赠比例将降低28%至42%。后者的减少主要集中在少于10美元的捐款中。这些发现表明,社会压力是挨家挨户捐赠的重要决定因素。结合此数据和补充的现场实验,我们在结构上估算了该模型。对州内慈善机构拒绝律师的社会压力估计成本为3.80美元,对州外慈善机构为1.40美元。我们的福利计算表明,我们的上门筹款活动平均会降低潜在捐助者的效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号