首页> 外文期刊>Quality progress >Narrow(er) FOCUS
【24h】

Narrow(er) FOCUS

机译:狭窄的焦点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When teaching failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), I start by determining who in the class has participated in creating one. Typically, more than half of the students raise their hands. Next, I ask how useful or accurate their FMEAs were. Responses usually include grumbling, a few shrugged shoulders and at least one thumbs-down. Rarely do I receive a positive response. Finally, I ask how much fun the FMEAs were. This question always produces a round of laughter and more thumbs-downs. Virtually everyone recognizes the potential value, power and utility of FMEAs, but rarely do they see that potential realized. Frequently, I hear creating an FMEA is time consuming, torturous and often confrontational, and the end product never meets expectations. Team members become tired and frustrated, and the overarching goal evolves into simply finishing it. If you feel an affinity, rejoice. It doesn't have to be this way.
机译:在教授失败模式和效果分析(FMEA)时,我首先确定班上谁参与了创建。通常,一半以上的学生举手。接下来,我问他们的FMEA有用或准确。回应通常包括抱怨,耸耸肩膀和至少一个大拇指朝下。我很少收到正面回应。最后,我想问一下FMEA有多有趣。这个问题总是引起一阵笑声和更多的不满。几乎每个人都认识到FMEA的潜在价值,功能和实用性,但很少有人看到这种潜力的实现。通常,我听说创建FMEA既费时,折磨且经常会引起对抗,并且最终产品从未达到预期。团队成员变得疲惫和沮丧,总体目标演变为简单地完成目标。如果您有亲和力,那就很高兴。不必一定是这种方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quality progress》 |2015年第1期|23-28|共6页
  • 作者

    James R. Kotterman;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:35:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号