首页> 外文期刊>Quality and Reliability Engineering International >Towards Improved Analysis Methods for Two-Level Factorial Experiments with TimeSeries Responses
【24h】

Towards Improved Analysis Methods for Two-Level Factorial Experiments with TimeSeries Responses

机译:具有时间序列响应的二级因子实验的改进分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dynamic processes exhibit a time delay between the disturbances and the resulting process response. Therefore, one has to acknowledge process dynamics, such as transition times, when planning and analyzing experiments in dynamic processes. In this article, we explore, discuss, and compare different methods to estimate location effects for two-level factorial experiments where the responses are represented by time series. Particularly, we outline the use of intervention-noise modeling to estimate the effects and to compare this method by using the averages of the response observations in each run as the single response. The comparisons are made by simulated experiments using a dynamic continuous process model. The results show that the effect estimates for the different analysis methods are similar. Using the average of the response in each run, but removing the transition time, is found to be a competitive, robust, and straightforward method, whereas intervention-noise models are found to be more comprehensive, render slightly fewer spurious effects, find more of the active effects for unreplicated experiments and provide the possibility to model effect dynamics. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:动态过程在干扰和所产生的过程响应之间表现出时间延迟。因此,在计划和分析动态过程中的实验时,必须承认过程动力学,例如过渡时间。在本文中,我们探索,讨论和比较不同的方法来估计两级析因实验的位置效应,其中以时间序列表示响应。特别是,我们概述了使用干预噪声建模来估计效果并通过将每次运行中的响应观察值的平均值作为单个响应来比较此方法。使用动态连续过程模型通过模拟实验进行比较。结果表明,不同分析方法的效果估计相似。使用每次运行中响应的平均值,但不删除过渡时间,是一种竞争,鲁棒和直接的方法,而干预噪声模型则更全面,产生的杂散效果稍差,发现更多重复实验的主动效果,并为效果动力学建模提供了可能性。版权所有©2012 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号