...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: an international journal >Reframing research in Indigenous countries: A methodological framework for research with/within Indigenous nations
【24h】

Reframing research in Indigenous countries: A methodological framework for research with/within Indigenous nations

机译:重新定义土著国家的研究:与土著国家/内部进行研究的方法框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to address some of the implications for methodology and ethics that arise when researchers in Indigenous territories locate their research projects as taking place within Indigenous countries. Centering the argument that ethical research with Indigenous communities must be rooted in upholding the primacy of Indigenous sovereignty, numerous considerations to improve qualitative research practices in Indigenous countries are discussed. Design/methodology/approach - The author starts by introducing his relationship to Indigenous research as a mixed-Indigenous researcher. Moving onto discussing preliminary research considerations for working in Indigenous territories, the author argues that qualitative researchers must become familiarized with the historical and geographical contexts of the Indigenous countries they plan on working in. Using Canadian history as an example, the author argues that settler-colonial nationalisms continue to attempt to erase and replace Indigenous countries both in historical and geographical narratives. Building on Indigenous literature, the author then outlines the necessity of being aware of nation-specific protocols in law, culture, and knowledge production. Findings - Drawing on this discussion, the author proposes a framework for preliminary research that can be used by qualitative researchers looking to ensure their projects are grounded in the best practices for the specific Indigenous countries they want to work with. Originality/value - The author concludes that researchers should not expect Indigenous knowledge keepers to contribute large amounts of labour towards debunking colonial mythology and proving the existence of Indigenous countries. By doing this work as part of the preliminary research process, researchers create space for better collaborations with Indigenous communities.
机译:目的-本文的目的是解决当土著领土的研究人员将其研究项目确定为在土著国家内部开展时对方法论和伦理学的影响。以必须与土著社区进行伦理研究为基础的论点为中心,讨论了改善土著国家定性研究实践的多种考虑。设计/方法/方法-作者首先介绍了他与土著研究的关系,他是一名混合土著研究者。在讨论有关在土著领土上工作的初步研究考虑时,作者认为定性研究人员必须熟悉他们计划在其上工作的土著国家的历史和地理背景。作者以加拿大的历史为例,认为定居者-殖民民族主义继续试图在历史和地理叙述中抹去和取代土著国家。然后,作者以土著文学为基础,概述了了解法律,文化和知识生产中特定于国家的协议的必要性。调查结果-作者在讨论的基础上,为初步研究提供了一个框架,定性研究人员可以使用这些框架,以确保他们的项目以与他们合作的特定土著国家的最佳实践为基础。原创性/价值-作者得出的结论是,研究人员不应期望土著知识保存者为揭穿殖民神话和证明土著国家的存在做出大量努力。通过在初步研究过程中进行这项工作,研究人员为与土著社区更好的合作创造了空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号