...
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy
【24h】

Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy

机译:讨论对话:对不影响政策的科学对话事件的价值的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While theoretical work and empirical research have examined science policy-informing "dialogue events," dialogue events that do not seek to inform public policy are under-theorized and under-researched, even though they are common and growing in popularity in the UK. We describe how, from a critical perspective, it may initially appear that such events cannot be justified without returning to the deficit model. But with this paper, we seek to open up a discussion about these non policy-informing events by arguing that there are in fact further ways to understand and frame them. We deliberately draw on different literatures and seek to make use of practitioner expertise within our discussion, in order to display several perspectives on the value of non-policy dialogue on science as sites of symmetrical individual or small-scale learning-rather than institutional learning-through social processes.
机译:尽管理论研究和实证研究都对科学政策相关的“对话事件”进行了研究,但是,尽管对话事件在英国很普遍,并且越来越流行,但是,没有试图为公共政策提供信息的对话事件仍未得到充分的理论和研究。我们从批判的角度描述了最初看来如何在不返回赤字模型的情况下无法证明此类事件是合理的。但是,通过本文,我们试图通过争论实际上还有更多的方式来理解和构架这些非政策性事件来展开讨论。我们故意借鉴不同的文献,并试图在讨论中利用从业者的专业知识,以期就科学上的非政策性对话作为对称的个人或小规模学习场所(而非机构性学习场所)的价值展示几种观点通过社会过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号