首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom
【24h】

Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom

机译:公民融合?纳米技术与巴西和英国公众参与的政治构想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper offers a comparative analysis of two public engagement exercises, conducted concurrently in the UK and Brazil. Following an account of how public engagement is situated in the political imaginary of the UK and Brazil, we set out a theoretical framework for such comparison, highlighting questions of narrative, political culture and civic epistemology. We then set out key differences in response, considering Brazilian citizen responses as prototypi-cally more positive of (nano)technology, and as more amenable to and accepting of Enlightenment master narratives of technoscientific progress. UK citizen responses, by contrast, were more tragic, and more informed by resistant narratives of technoscientific failure. Although such distinctions are not absolute, they are nevertheless significant. We conclude by pointing to a set of analytical and normative challenges for how the science and technology studies analyst is to understand the politically contingent character of public engagement in the governance of science and technology.
机译:本文对在英国和巴西同时进行的两次公众参与活动进行了比较分析。在说明了公众参与在英国和巴西的政治想象中如何定位之后,我们提出了进行这种比较的理论框架,突出了叙事,政治文化和公民认识论的问题。然后,我们在回应上设定了主要差异,认为巴西公民的回应在原型上对(nano)技术更加积极,对技术科学进步的启蒙大师级叙述也更满意和接受。相比之下,英国公民的回应则更具悲剧性,并且对技术科学失败的反驳叙述更为深刻。尽管这样的区分不是绝对的,但是它们仍然很重要。最后,我们指出了一组分析和规范上的挑战,这些挑战是科学技术研究分析师如何理解公众参与科学技术治理的政治特质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号