首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Nacherzeugung, Nachverstehen: A phenomenological perspective on how public understanding of science changes by engaging with online media
【24h】

Nacherzeugung, Nachverstehen: A phenomenological perspective on how public understanding of science changes by engaging with online media

机译:Nacherzeugung,Nachverstehen:一种现象学观点,通过与在线媒体互动,公众如何理解科学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is widely acknowledged in science education that everyday understandings and evidence are generally inconsistent with the scientific view of the matter: "heartache" has little to do with matters cardiopulmonary, and a rising or setting sun actually reflects the movements of the earth. How then does a member of the general public, which in many areas of science is characterized as "illiterate" and "non-scientific," come to regard something scientifically? Moreover, how do traditional unscientific (e.g., Ptolemaic) views continue their lives, even many centuries after scientists have overthrown them in what are termed scientific (e.g., Copernican) revolutions? In this study, we develop a phenomenological perspective, using Edmund Husserl's categories of Nacherzeugung and Nachverstehen, which provide descriptive explanations for our observations. These observations are contextualized in a case study using online video and historical materials concerning the motions of the heart and blood to exemplify our explanations.
机译:在科学教育中,人们普遍承认,日常的理解和证据通常与该问题的科学观点不一致:“心痛”与心肺问题无关,而升起的太阳或落日实际上反映了地球的运动。那么,在许多科学领域被称为“文盲”和“非科学”的普通大众如何科学地对待某些事物呢?此外,传统的非科学观点(例如托勒密主义)如何继续延续下去,甚至在科学家以所谓的科学革命(例如哥白尼革命)推翻了它们之后的数百年之内?在这项研究中,我们使用埃德蒙·胡塞尔(Edmund Husserl)的Nacherzeugung和Nachverstehen类别建立了现象学视角,为我们的观察提供了描述性解释。在一个案例研究中,使用在线视频和有关心脏和血液运动的历史资料对这些观察进行了背景研究,以例证我们的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号