首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >A desire for authoritative science? How citizens' informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic
【24h】

A desire for authoritative science? How citizens' informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic

机译:渴望权威的科学? 公民的信息需求和认知信念如何形成科学,新闻和政策制作的观点,在Covid-19流行病中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The coronavirus pandemic created a situation in which virological and epidemiological science became highly politically relevant but was uncertain and fragmented. This raises the question as to how science could inform policymaking and public debate on societal crisis management. Based on an online survey of Germans (N= 1513) representative for age, gender, education, and place of residence, we investigate citizens' prescriptive views of the relationships between science, policymaking, and the media. Views differ depending on their informational needs and epistemic beliefs. People with a need for definite information and a view of scientific knowledge as static wanted scientists to dominate policymaking and journalists to deliver definite information about the coronavirus. People with an informational need to construct their own opinions wanted journalists to question policy and scientific advice. Furthermore, they rejected the idea of scientists dominating policymaking. Results are discussed with reference to theories of science and democracy.
机译:冠状病毒大流行产生了一种病毒学和流行病学科学变得高度政治相关但不确定和分散的情况。这提出了科学如何能够为各种危机管理提供政策制定和公开辩论的问题。基于对德国人(N = 1513)年龄,性别,教育和居住地代表的在线调查,我们调查了公民对科学,政策制定与媒体之间的关系的规范意见。观点因其信息需求和认知信念而有所不同。有需要确定的信息和科学知识视为静态希望科学家们占据政策制定和记者,以提供有关冠状病毒的明确信息。有信息需要建立自己的意见的人希望记者质疑政策和科学建议。此外,他们拒绝了科学家的主导决策的想法。结果是关于科学和民主理论讨论的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号