首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Expert communication on Twitter: Comparing economists' and scientists' social networks, topics and communicative styles
【24h】

Expert communication on Twitter: Comparing economists' and scientists' social networks, topics and communicative styles

机译:Twitter专家沟通:比较经济学家和科学家的社交网络,主题和沟通风格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Experts increasingly use social media to communicate with the wider public, prompted by the need to demonstrate impact and public engagement. While previous research on the use of social media by experts focused on single topics and performed sentiment analysis, we propose to extend the scope by investigating experts' networks, topics and communicative styles. We perform social and semantic network as well language analysis of top tweeting scientists and economists. We find that economists tweet less, mention fewer people and have fewer Twitter conversations with members of the public than scientists. Scientists use a more informal and involved style and engage wider audiences through multimedia contents, while economists use more jargon, and tend to favour traditional written media. The results point to differences in experts' communicative practices online, and we propose that disciplinary ways of 'talking' may pose obstacles to an effective public communication of expert knowledge.
机译:专家越来越多地利用社交媒体与更广泛的公众沟通,促进了展示了影响和公众参与的必要性。虽然以前通过专家使用社交媒体的研究专注于单一主题并进行情感分析,但我们建议通过调查专家的网络,主题和交流风格来扩大范围。我们表现​​了社会和语义网络,作为顶级推文科学家和经济学家的语言分析。我们发现经济学家推文更少,提到更少的人,并且与公众的谈话比科学家们更少。科学家使用更加非正式的和涉及的风格,并通过多媒体内容使用更广泛的受众,而经济学家使用更多的术语,并倾向于支持传统的书面媒体。结果指出了专家交际实践在线的差异,我们提出了“谈话”的纪律方式可能会对专业知识的有效公共交流构成障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号