首页> 外文期刊>Public Opinion Quarterly >The Association of Survey Setting and Mode with Self-Reported Health Risk Behaviors among High School Students
【24h】

The Association of Survey Setting and Mode with Self-Reported Health Risk Behaviors among High School Students

机译:高中生调查设置和方式与自我报告健康风险行为的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study examined whether the prevalence of self-reported health risk behaviors among high school students varied by survey setting (school versus home) and mode of administration (paper and pencil versus computer). Students in grades 9 and 11 were assigned randomly to one of four conditions—school paper-and-pencil instrument (PAPI), school computer-assisted self-interview (CASI), home PAPI, and home CASI. During the spring of 2004, 4,506 students completed identically worded questionnaires based on the Youth Risk Behavior Survey questionnaire. Logistic regression analyses controlling for sex, grade, and race/ethnicity revealed that setting was associated significantly with the reporting of 30 of the 55 risk behaviors examined, and mode was associated significantly with the reporting of 7 of the 55 behaviors. For all behaviors with a significant setting main effect, the odds of reporting the behavior were greater among students who completed questionnaires at school than among students who completed questionnaires at home. For all behaviors with a significant mode main effect, PAPI mode students had lower odds of reporting the behavior than CASI mode students. Because social measurement research assumes that higher prevalence estimates are more valid than lower estimates, methodological factors shown to increase estimates, such as setting and mode, should be considered when planning surveys.
机译:这项研究调查了高中生自我报告的健康风险行为的患病率是否因调查环境(学校与家庭)和管理方式(纸张,铅笔与计算机)不同而不同。 9年级和11年级的学生被随机分配到以下四个条件之一:学校纸笔工具(PAPI),学校计算机辅助自我访谈(CASI),家庭PAPI和家庭CASI。在2004年春季,根据青年风险行为调查问卷,有4,506名学生完成了措辞相同的问卷。对性别,年级和种族/族裔进行控制的逻辑回归分析显示,设置与所检查的55种危险行为中的30种报告显着相关,而模式与55种行为中的7种报告显着相关。对于所有具有重大设定主要影响的行为,在学校完成问卷调查的学生报告行为的几率比在家完成问卷调查的学生大。对于所有具有重大模式主效应的行为,PAPI模式学生的行为举报几率均低于CASI模式学生。由于社会测量研究假设较高的患病率估计比较低的患病率更有效,因此在计划调查时应考虑显示出增加估计值的方法论因素,例如设置和模式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Public Opinion Quarterly》 |2006年第3期|354-374|共21页
  • 作者单位

    nancy d. brener danice k. eaton and laura kann are with the Division of Adolescent and School Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Atlanta GA. jo anne grunbaum is now with the Division of Adult and Community Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion CDC. lori a. gross tonja m. kyle and james g. ross are with Macro International (ORC Macro) Calverton MD.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号