首页> 外文期刊>Public Opinion Quarterly >Affirmative Action Programs for Women and Minorities
【24h】

Affirmative Action Programs for Women and Minorities

机译:妇女和少数族裔平等权利行动纲领

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines the effects of question ordering on support for affirmative action (AA) for women and racial minorities. Public opinion surveys show that the public expresses greater support for gender-targeted AA than for race-targeted AA, but no research has addressed the extent to which expressed support for one group influences expressed support toward the other. We examine this question by testing the effects of question order on reported support for race and gender targets. Using a split-ballot experimental design, national data show that presenting gender-targeted AA before race-targeted AA increases reported support for the racial target, and conversely, presenting race-targeted AA first decreases reported support for gender-targeted AA. The order effects imply that race still has a significant impact on these considerations. The study finds exceptions to this rule among blacks and liberals, whose support for AA programs is unaffected by the order in which the programs are considered.
机译:本文研究了问题排序对支持妇女和少数民族平等权利行动(AA)的影响。舆论调查显示,公众对以性别为目标的AA的支持比对种族为目标的AA的支持更大,但尚无研究涉及对一个群体的支持表示在多大程度上对另一群体表示支持。我们通过测试问题顺序对报道的种族和性别目标支持的影响来检验该问题。国家数据使用分裂投票实验设计显示,在以种族为目标的AA之前呈现针对性别的AA会增加对种族目标的支持,相反,呈现以种族为目标的AA首先会降低对性别为目标的AA的支持。顺序效应表明种族仍然对这些考虑有重大影响。研究发现,黑人和自由主义者对此规则有例外,他们对AA计划的支持不受计划考虑顺序的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号