...
首页> 外文期刊>Public Money & Management >A model or a policy muddle? An evaluation of rail franchising in the UK
【24h】

A model or a policy muddle? An evaluation of rail franchising in the UK

机译:模式还是政策混乱?对英国铁路特许经营的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Rail privatization led to a large increase in both costs and subsidy, and there have been substantial performance and regulatory problems with rail franchises. This article examines these problems in the context of recent developments, including the impact of the recession on train operators and the plan to increase the proportion of rail funding provided by passenger fares from 50% to 75%. Franchising is, in the language of the House of Commons Transport Select Committee, a policy muddle. A way forward would be to bring franchises into the public sector as they expire or as train operators run into difficulties.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2010.525002
机译:铁路私有化导致成本和补贴大幅增加,并且铁路特许经营存在重大的绩效和监管问题。本文在最近的事态发展中考察了这些问题,包括经济衰退对火车运营商的影响以及计划将由旅客票价提供的铁路资金所占比例从50%提高到75%的计划。用下议院运输选择委员会的语言来说,特许经营是一个政策上的混乱。一种前进的方式是在特许经营权到期或列车运营商陷入困境时将其带入公共部门。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter, technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2010.525002

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号