首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Do electoral institutions have an impact on population health?
【24h】

Do electoral institutions have an impact on population health?

机译:选举机构对人口健康有影响吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is an emerging political economics literature which purports to show that legislatures elected based on proportional electoral rules spend more and redistribute more than legislatures elected based on majoritarian electoral rules. Going a step further the authors of this paper consider whether degree of electoral proportionality has an impact on population health and, in particular, the health of the least advantaged members of society. A panel of 24 parliamentary democracies for the years 1960-2004 is used to examine the relationship between electoral institutions and health. The authors find that greater electoral proportionality is positively associated with overall population health (as indicated by life expectancy) and with the health of the poorest (as indicated by a reduction in infant mortality). A panel of 17 countries for the years 1970-2004 is then used to show to that electoral permissiveness modifies the impact of health spending on infant mortality.
机译:有新兴的政治经济学文献表明,基于比例选举规则选举产生的立法机构比基于多数派选举规则选举产生的立法机构花费更多,分配更多。更进一步,本文的作者考虑选举比例的程度是否对人口健康,特别是对社会上最弱势群体的健康产生影响。 1960-2004年由24个议会民主制国家组成的小组用来审查选举机构与卫生之间的关系。作者发现,更大的选举比例与总体人口健康(如预期寿命所示)和最贫困人口的健康(如婴儿死亡率降低)呈正相关。然后,由17个国家组成的小组对1970-2004年进行了研究,结果表明选举许可改变了卫生支出对婴儿死亡率的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号