首页> 外文期刊>Public administration review >Commentary: 'Playing the Wrong PART: The Program Assessment Rating Tool and the Functions of the President's Budget'
【24h】

Commentary: 'Playing the Wrong PART: The Program Assessment Rating Tool and the Functions of the President's Budget'

机译:评论:“扮演错误的角色:计划评估评级工具和总统预算的职能”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The extensive research that I and others did at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and at the International Monetary Fund indicates that countries-and the analysts who review them-often confuse performance budgeting with performance-informed budgeting. The former is much more involved with the allocation of resources based on achieved results. In the latter, performance information is important in the budget decision-making process, but it does not determine the amount of resources allocated, nor does it have a predefined weight in decisions. This confusion is evident in the application of Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) information in the United States, as described in Professor Joseph White's article.
机译:我和其他人在经济合作与发展组织和国际货币基金组织所做的广泛研究表明,各国(以及对其进行审查的分析师)经常将绩效预算与基于绩效的预算相混淆。前者更多地涉及根据已取得的成果分配资源。在后者中,绩效信息在预算决策过程中很重要,但是它不能确定分配的资源量,也不能在决策中具有预定义的权重。如约瑟夫·怀特教授的文章中所述,这种混淆在美国应用程序评估评级工具(PART)信息中很明显。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Public administration review》 |2012年第1期|p.121-122|共2页
  • 作者

    Barry Anderson;

  • 作者单位

    National Governors Association Department of Political Science at Case Western Reserve University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号