...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological medicine >Medical co-morbidity and validity of DSM-IV depression criteria.
【24h】

Medical co-morbidity and validity of DSM-IV depression criteria.

机译:DSM-IV抑郁标准的医学合并症和有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Clinicians have questioned the validity of depression criteria in patients with chronic medical illness, but few empirical data address this question. METHOD: Computerized records identified two samples of managed care patients beginning depression treatment: 235 with diabetes, ischemic heart disease, or chronic obstructive lung disease and 204 without those conditions. Telephone assessments at baseline, 2 months, and 6 months included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and other measures of depression severity and functional status. Item Response Theory analyses compared patterns of depressive symptoms across groups and specifically evaluated somatic symptoms (fatigue, change in weight or appetite, psychomotor agitation/retardation, and sleep disturbance) as indicators of depression. Logistic regression examined how change in somatic symptoms during treatment varied between patient groups. RESULTS: Overall item response analysis indicated differential item functioning between groups (chi2=33.7, df=18, p=0.017). Two of eight item-level comparisons were statistically significant; one in the predicted direction (patients with co-morbidity reported more fatigue at low levels of depression: chi2=17.9, df=1, p<0.001) and one in the opposite direction from predicted (patients with co-morbidity reported less psychomotor agitation/retardation at low levels of depression: chi2=8.0, df=1, p=0.005). Observed differences were modest: at the midpoint of the depression severity scale, patients with medical co-morbidity had a 54% probability of reporting fatigue compared to 45% in those without co-morbidity. All four somatic symptoms showed robust improvement with treatment, and this improvement did not differ significantly between patients with and without medical co-morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: We find only limited evidence that fatigue, changes in weight or appetite, psychomotor agitation/retardation, and sleep disturbance are less valid indicators of depression in patients with chronic medical illness. DSM-IV criteria for diagnosis of depression do not require significant modification for patients with medical co-morbidity.
机译:背景:临床医生已经对抑郁症标准在慢性病患者中的有效性提出了质疑,但是很少有经验数据可以解决这个问题。方法:计算机记录确定了开始抑郁症治疗的两名护理患者样本:235例患有糖尿病,缺血性心脏病或慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患者和204例未患上述疾病的患者。在基线,2个月和6个月时进行的电话评估包括DSM-IV的结构化临床访谈以及其他抑郁程度和功能状态的测量。项目反应理论分析了各组抑郁症状的比较模式,并特别评估了躯体症状(疲劳,体重或食欲变化,精神运动性躁动/延迟和睡眠障碍)作为抑郁的指标。 Logistic回归研究检查了不同患者组在治疗过程中躯体症状的变化。结果:总体项目反应分析表明,不同组之间的项目功能不同(chi2 = 33.7,df = 18,p = 0.017)。八个项目级别的比较中有两个具有统计学意义; 1个处于预测的方向(合并症的患者在低水平的抑郁症中表现出更多的疲劳:chi2 = 17.9,df = 1,p <0.001),另一个处于与预测的方向相反的方向(合并症的患者报告了较少的精神运动性躁动/在低水平抑郁时的延迟:chi2 = 8.0,df = 1,p = 0.005)。观察到的差异不大:在抑郁症严重程度量表的中点,患有合并症的患者报告疲劳的可能性为54%,而没有合并症的患者为45%。所有四种躯体症状在治疗后均表现出明显的改善,并且在有和没有医疗合并症的患者之间,这种改善没有显着差异。结论:我们发现仅有有限的证据表明,在慢性病患者中,疲劳,体重或食欲变化,精神运动性躁动/迟缓和睡眠障碍是抑郁症的较无效指标。对于患有合并症的患者,DSM-IV诊断抑郁症的标准不需要重大修改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号