首页> 外文期刊>Property Management >The fee tendering and service quality issue revisited
【24h】

The fee tendering and service quality issue revisited

机译:再次讨论了招标和服务质量问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – It is a little over 20 years since mandatory fee scales were abolished by UK professional bodies. During this period fee levels have fluctuated with economic demand, and new procurement strategies such as partnering have been developed, but there is still a widespread view in industry that fee levels are too low. This view is shared by many professionals, and perhaps more surprisingly by clients, even in the current construction and property boom. The purpose of this paper is to report research on the link between competitive fee tendering and clients' perceptions of service quality in the UK property industry. The main hypothesis is that there is a causal relationship between service quality and the method of appointment of the professional. Design/methodology/approach – The research involved unstructured interviews with clients and professionals and a postal questionnaire study of one 133 UK based clients. The questionnaire study was a repeat of a similar survey conducted eight years previously in very different economic conditions. The public and private sector clients each assessed the service quality received from a professional using a measurement scale developed from the generic service industry instrument SERVQUAL. The scale is used to test the main hypothesis and four sub-hypotheses. There were twice as many private sector clients completing the questionnaires as there were public sector clients and the largest group of professionals assessed were General Practice Chartered Surveyors. Findings – The results of the recent study are similar to the earlier one (in that evidence of the predicted relationship is not provided by the data) but there are some interesting differences in the results of both studies – fee tendering has declined in popularity, direct appointment has increased, but less than 5 per cent of the commissions were let on a partnered basis. Practical implications – Property managers and other professionals may wish to make use of the service quality measurement scale in order assess the service they provide to clients. Originality/value – The research provides confirmation that clients do not perceive that a lower standard of service quality is provided for fee-tendered commissions. It also extends the already substantial body of research based upon the SERVQUAL measurement technique.
机译:目的–自英国专业机构废除强制收费标准以来已有20年多的时间。在此期间,费用水平随经济需求而波动,并且已经开发了诸如合作伙伴关系之类的新采购策略,但是业内仍然普遍认为费用水平太低。即使在当前的建筑和房地产热潮中,这种观点也被许多专业人士,甚至更令人惊讶的是,客户都认同。本文的目的是报告有关竞争性费用招标与客户对英国房地产业服务质量的看法之间的联系的研究。主要假设是服务质量与专业人员的任命方法之间存在因果关系。设计/方法/方法–研究涉及对客户和专业人员的非结构化访谈,以及对一名133名英国客户的邮政问卷调查。问卷调查是八年前在非常不同的经济条件下进行的类似调查的重复。公共和私营部门的客户分别使用通用服务行业工具SERVQUAL制定的衡量标准评估了从专业人员那里获得的服务质量。该量表用于检验主要假设和四个子假设。完成问卷调查的私营部门客户是公共部门客户的两倍,而接受评估的专业人士最多的是通用执业特许测量师。调查结果–最近的研究结果与早期的研究结果相似(数据未提供预测关系的证据),但两项研究的结果都有一些有趣的差异–费用招标的受欢迎程度有所下降,直接任命有所增加,但只有不到5%的委员会是以合伙形式获得的。实际意义–物业经理和其他专业人员可能希望利用服务质量衡量标准来评估他们向客户提供的服务。独创性/价值–该研究证实了客户没有意识到为收费的佣金提供了较低的服务质量标准。它还扩展了基于SERVQUAL测量技术的实质性研究范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号