首页> 外文期刊>Property Management >Is the social agenda driving sustainable property development in Melbourne, Australia?
【24h】

Is the social agenda driving sustainable property development in Melbourne, Australia?

机译:社会议程是否在推动澳大利亚墨尔本的房地产可持续发展?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – Sustainable property development has increased in market share over the past two to three years globally and locally. This research aims to analyze the drivers and barriers to sustainable property development in Melbourne using the triple bottom line (TBL) theoretical framework. The TBL posits that sustainability has social, economic and environmental aspects to fulfil. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire was sent out to 190 developers in Melbourne who promoted sustainable property development to ascertain their views about the drivers and barriers. Findings – This research indicates that in the 2007 Melbourne market the drivers were social rather than economic. The data reveal that social reasons are considered more than economic arguments for incorporating sustainability into developments. The business case, or the economic drivers for sustainability alone do not convince developers. Research limitations/implications – The questionnaire survey informed us about developers' views but not why they have these views. The sample was limited to Melbourne. Practical implications – More developments are required for developers to become convinced of the benefits. The relatively low price of energy undermines the business case for sustainability in property here and needs to be fully costed. Originality/value – This paper illustrates that whilst the theoretical framework cites three key areas for sustainability, the reality is that developers are currently driven by social and environmental factors primarily and the business case is not accepted by the majority of developers.
机译:目的–在过去的两到三年中,可持续的房地产开发在全球和本地市场份额增加。这项研究旨在使用三重底线(TBL)理论框架来分析墨尔本可持续房地产发展的驱动因素和障碍。 TBL认为,可持续性要实现社会,经济和环境方面的要求。设计/方法/方法-向墨尔本的190位开发商发送了调查表,他们促进了可持续房地产开发,以查明他们对驱动力和障碍的看法。调查结果–该研究表明,在2007年墨尔本市场,驱动力来自社会而非经济。数据表明,将经济增长纳入可持续发展考虑的不仅仅是社会原因。商业案例或可持续性的经济驱动因素并不能说服开发人员。研究的局限性/含意–问卷调查向我们介绍了开发人员的观点,但没有告知他们为什么有这些观点。样本仅限于墨尔本。实际意义–要使开发人员确信其好处,还需要进行更多开发。相对较低的能源价格破坏了这里房地产可持续发展的商业理由,需要全额支付成本。原创性/价值–本文说明,尽管理论框架列举了可持续性的三个关键领域,但现实情况是,开发商目前主要受社会和环境因素的驱动,而业务案例却未被大多数开发商接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号