首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Oceanography >Comparability between box-corer and epibenthic-sledge data on higher taxon level: A case study based on deep-sea samples from the NW Pacific
【24h】

Comparability between box-corer and epibenthic-sledge data on higher taxon level: A case study based on deep-sea samples from the NW Pacific

机译:较高分类群水平上的箱心和表皮雪橇数据之间的可比性:基于西北太平洋深海样本的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The vastness and difficult accessibility of the deep sea, together with the previous thought that it harboured no life, has hampered research in this environment until the nineteenth century, when the exponential discovery of new species was rapidly combined with the development of new gears to explore the deep-sea fauna. Nevertheless, apparatuses developed in the twentieth century are still used to sample benthic organisms nowadays. Among them, box corers (BC) and epibenthic sledges (EBS) are the most common ones applied in macrofaunal studies. In this study, the comparability between these two gears from samples collected at the deep NW Pacific was tested by means of non-permutational ANOVA. Using uni- and multivariate analyses, we tested whether significant differences could be found between gears using the univariate indices: high taxa richness, total abundance, evenness, estimated number of taxa, and Shannon diversity; and the multivariate indices: total abundance, presence|absence, and relative abundance. Results indicate that both gears can be comparable when evenness, estimated number of taxa, and Shannon diversity (univariate indices) are used, as well as relative abundances based on the multivariate data matrix. This means that data derived from the EBS can be used in a quantitative way, for e.g. in an ecological context, up to a certain extent. On the other hand, significant differences between BC and EBS were found for total abundance and species richness. This could be a result of the bigger amount of sediment the EBS collects together with a larger sampled area by this gear, consequently leading to a higher amount of organisms and taxa sampled. Moreover, despite the interchangeability between these two gears was possible for some indices at higher taxa level, caution should be taken into account when comparing data for other deep-sea areas and at species level.
机译:深海的广阔和难以到达,再加上以前认为没有生命的思想,一直阻碍了这种环境的研究,直到19世纪,新物种的指数发现迅速与新装备的探索相结合。深海动物区系。然而,当今二十世纪开发的仪器仍用于采样底栖生物。其中,箱角类(BC)和表皮雪橇(EBS)是大型动物研究中最常用的。在这项研究中,通过非置换方差分析测试了在西北太平洋深处采集的样本中这两个齿轮之间的可比性。使用单变量和多变量分析,我们使用单变量指标测试了是否可以在齿轮之间发现显着差异:高的分类单元丰富度,总丰度,均匀度,分类单元的估计数量和香农多样性;多元指标:总丰度,存在度和相对丰度。结果表明,当使用均匀性,估计的分类单元数量和Shannon多样性(单变量指数)以及基于多元数据矩阵的相对丰度时,这两个齿轮可以比较。这意味着从EBS导出的数据可以以定量方式使用,例如在一定程度上是生态的。另一方面,发现BC和EBS之间的总丰度和物种丰富度存在显着差异。这可能是由于EBS通过此设备收集到的沉积物数量更多,而采样面积也更大,因此导致了更多的生物体和类群采样。此外,尽管某些分类指数在较高的分类单元水平上可以实现这两个齿轮之间的互换性,但在比较其他深海区域和物种水平的数据时应谨慎。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Progress in Oceanography》 |2020年第3期|102273.1-102273.7|共7页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Senckenberg Res Inst Senckenberganlage 25 D-60325 Frankfurt Germany|Nat Hist Museum Senckenberganlage 25 D-60325 Frankfurt Germany|Goethe Univ Frankfurt Inst Ecol Evolut & Divers FB 15 Max von Laue Str 13 D-60439 Frankfurt Germany|Univ Ghent Marine Biol Res Grp Krijgslaan 281-S8 B-9000 Ghent Belgium;

    Senckenberg Res Inst Senckenberganlage 25 D-60325 Frankfurt Germany|Nat Hist Museum Senckenberganlage 25 D-60325 Frankfurt Germany|Goethe Univ Frankfurt Inst Ecol Evolut & Divers FB 15 Max von Laue Str 13 D-60439 Frankfurt Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Benthic fauna; Kuril-Kamchatka Trench; Deep-sea gears; Sampling techniques; Ecological indices;

    机译:底栖动物区系;千岛-堪察加海沟;深海装备;采样技术;生态指标;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 05:19:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号