首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Nuclear Energy >A comparison of the HLW underground repository cost for the vertical and horizontal emplacement options in Korea
【24h】

A comparison of the HLW underground repository cost for the vertical and horizontal emplacement options in Korea

机译:HLW地下仓库在韩国的垂直和水平安置方案成本比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study presents the results of an economic analysis for a comparison of the vertical and horizontal emplacement alternatives with respect to an HLW repository. According to the cost analysis undertaken in the Korean case, the horizontal emplacement option was more economical than the vertical one. In order to estimate such an emplacement alternative, a conceptual framework should be designed first to the cost objects, and then cost drivers and economic indicators are taken into consideration. The major difference between a vertical emplacement and a horizontal one was that the long horizontal disposal drifts of the horizontal emplacement replace the disposal holes and disposal tunnels of the vertical emplacement with vertical holes. Therefore, in the case of a horizontal emplacement, several canisters are installed in the long horizontal disposal drifts instead of one canister per one disposal hole of the vertical emplacement option.
机译:这项研究提出了经济分析的结果,用于比较高放仓库的垂直和水平安置方案。根据在韩国案例中进行的成本分析,水平安置方案比垂直安置方案更经济。为了估算这种安置方案,应首先针对成本对象设计一个概念框架,然后考虑成本动因和经济指标。垂直布置与水平布置之间的主要区别在于,水平布置的较长的水平布置漂移用垂直孔代替了垂直布置的布置孔和布置隧道。因此,在水平放置的情况下,在较长的水平处理槽中安装了多个滤罐,而不是在垂直放置选件的每个处理孔中安装一个滤罐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号