...
首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Nuclear Energy >Site core damage frequency for multi-unit Nuclear Power Plants site
【24h】

Site core damage frequency for multi-unit Nuclear Power Plants site

机译:多单元核电站站点的站点核心损坏频率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The nuclear generating sites around the world are mostly twin unit and multi-unit sites. The PSA risk metrics Core Damage Frequency (CDF) and Large Early Release Frequency (LERF) currently are based on per reactor reference. The models for level 1 and level 2 PSA have been developed based on single unit. The Fukushima accident has spawned the need to address the issue of site base risk metrics, Site Core Damage Frequency (SCDF) and Site Large Early Release Frequency (SLERF), on the site years rather than reactor years. It is required to develop a holistic framework for risk assessment of a site. In the context of current study, the holistic framework refers to integration of risk from all units, dependencies due to external events and operation time of individual units. There is currently no general consensus on how to arrive at site-specific risk metrics. Some documents provide suggestions for site CDF and site LERF. This paper proposes a new method of aggregation of risk metric from the consideration of operating time of individual units under certain assumptions with a purpose to provide a new conceptual aspect for multi-unit PSA. The result of a case study on hypothetical data shows that site level CDF is not sum of CDF of all units but around 18% higher than unit level CDF. When the CDF is considered to be a random variable then, the new methodology produces site CDF as 50% higher than single unit CDF. These two approaches have been detailed in the paper. For a general data set of CDF for individual units, site CDF would more than individual unit CDF however, it would not be multiples of a single unit value. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:世界各地的核电站大多是双机组和多机组站点。 PSA风险度量标准的核心损坏频率(CDF)和大提前释放频率(LERF)当前基于每个反应堆参考。 1级和2级PSA的模型是基于单个单元开发的。福岛事故催生了在站点年限而非反应堆年解决站点基础风险指标,站点核心损坏频率(SCDF)和站点大型早期释放频率(SLERF)的问题。需要开发用于风险评估的整体框架。在当前研究的背景下,整体框架是指来自所有部门的风险,由于外部事件和各个部门的运行时间而引起的依赖性的整合。关于如何得出针对特定地点的风险指标,目前尚无普遍共识。一些文档为站点CDF和站点LERF提供了建议。本文提出了一种在某些假设下考虑单个单元运行时间的风险度量聚合新方法,旨在为多单元PSA提供一个新的概念方面。对假设数据进行案例研究的结果表明,站点级别CDF并非所有单元的CDF之和,但比单元级别CDF高18%左右。当CDF被认为是随机变量时,新方法将产生的站点CDF比单个单元CDF高50%。本文详细介绍了这两种方法。对于单个单位的CDF的常规数据集,站点CDF会比单个单位CDF多,但是,它不是单个单位值的倍数。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号