首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Planning >The spatial form of poverty in Charles Booth's London
【24h】

The spatial form of poverty in Charles Booth's London

机译:查尔斯·布斯(Charles Booth)伦敦的贫困空间形式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This chapter reviews recent research into poverty and spatial form and describes how the application of space syntax methods to this research area, coupled with the use of primary data from the Charles Booth maps of poverty in 19th century London, has enabled analysis of the socio-economic and spatial structure of areas frequently perceived as 'ghettos'. Through a comparison of two distinctive areas of London - Soho in the West End and the famously poor area of London's East End -the analysis shows a consistent correspondence between poverty and spatial segregation. Booth's economically based 'line of poverty', used to distinguish between those 'in poverty' and those living 'in comfort', is supplemented in this chapter by a proposed spatially defined line of poverty, distinguishing between poor, spatially segregated streets and more prosperous, spatially integrated streets. Furthermore, through the application of the latest segment angular techniques, space syntax analysis reveals a new finding relating to the formation of poverty areas, which combine low integration with large numbers of small street blocks, suggesting that this combination of spatial factors helps explain the persistence of poverty and poor quality housing, detrimental to the living standards of the poverty classes. This finding also helps explain how such areas can create a sense of entering 'another world', with the emergence of sub-cultures and new communities. The chapter concludes with the proposition that when such areas are located close to economically active, well-integrated streets, such spatial patterning can serve as a necessary mechanism for the social integration of minorities and is frequently part of a natural process of acculturation and integration in the urban environment.
机译:本章回顾了对贫困和空间形式的最新研究,并描述了空间语法方法在该研究领域的应用,以及如何利用19世纪伦敦贫困地区的查尔斯·布斯(Charles Booth)绘制的主要数据,对社会性别进行了分析。经常被称为“贫民窟”的地区的经济和空间结构。通过比较伦敦的两个独特地区-西区的苏活区(Soho)和著名的伦敦东区的贫困区-分析表明,贫困与空间隔离之间有着一致的对应关系。在本章中,以展位的经济基础上的“贫困线”来区分“处于贫困中”和“生活在舒适中”,并在空间上定义了贫困线,以区分贫困,空间分隔的街道和较繁华的街道。 ,空间整合的街道。此外,通过使用最新的分段角度技术,空间语法分析揭示了与贫困地区形成有关的新发现,该发现将低整合度与大量小街区结合在一起,表明这种空间因素的组合有助于解释持久性。贫困和劣质住房,这不利于贫困阶层的生活水平。这一发现还有助于解释这些地区如何随着亚文化和新社区的出现而营造一种进入“另一个世界”的感觉。本章以命题结尾,即当这些地区靠近经济活跃,融合良好的街道时,这种空间格局可作为少数民族社会融合的必要机制,并且经常是自然文化适应和融合过程的一部分。城市环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号